On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 11:28:44AM +0100, Steve Harris wrote:
> plugin" on google doesn't come up with anything much. The only audio
> related things for "pod" I could see are: a guitar effects processor called
not to forget about the POD algorithmic composition programm by
canadian composer barry
On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 12:29:01AM +0200, fons adriaensen wrote:
> On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 02:03:03AM +0400, Andrew Gaydenko wrote:
>
> > Is there some kind of software with sweep-oscillator
> > functionality (preferably JACK-enabled)?
>
> SC3, PD, Csound and most softsynths.
... plus non-rt go
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 08:19:00PM -0400, Ivica Ico Bukvic wrote:
> freebirth. Audacity doesn't cooperate with either, while jacklaunch even
> though it has been reported to work with sweep doesn't on my machines (mdk
> 10.0 and 10.1).
jacklaunch(1) worked for us with realplayer, which is, i know,
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 03:51:35PM +, Georg Holzmann wrote:
> I'm just planning a similar project, where the user can build a GUI and
> can send OSC-messages with it to PD, supercollider, max, ...
> Just another question on the OSC implementation:
> I planned to implement the application in Q
hi arnold,
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 09:12:19PM +0100, Arnold Krille wrote:
> I had a look into Steve Harris' liblo and libOSC++. The later seems more
> appealing to me since I am a C++-Guy.
two years ago, i added the network classes (Inet*) to libOSC++, fixed
some bugs, cleaned up a bit... the l
On Sun, Dec 12, 2004 at 02:08:58PM +0100, Robert Jonsson wrote:
> Currently there are 924 subscribers to LAU, 806 to LAD but only 355 to the
> announce list. First, I believe most announcements deserve a larger audience
i just subscribed to laa in order to benefit from the new policy :-)
the re
hi *,
On Sun, Dec 12, 2004 at 01:58:08PM +0200, Kai Vehmanen wrote:
> My suggestion is that we drop this policy altogether: announcements should
> be sent to LAA and optionally to LAD and/or LAU. At least I've always had
totally agreed. being subscribed to another mailing list does not
harm as l
On Sun, Dec 05, 2004 at 04:11:19AM +0100, Marek Peteraj wrote:
> In case you haven't found the thread, feel free to start it.
done.
> We need to agree on the topic so that people can easily find it:
> "Linux audio, ALSA and RME support"
agreed.
bests,
martin
On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 03:59:15AM +0100, Marek Peteraj wrote:
> Additional note:
>
> Since i've been involved in discussions on that forum, it would be
> better if anybody else volunteered to start the thread.
i could do that, but sorry, was out for a few days and i am very busy
ATM. will do t
On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 09:29:48PM +0100, Marek Peteraj wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-12-03 at 17:42, Dave Robillard wrote:
> > And since you volunteered... :)
>
> The rule would be to agree on the subject under which the thread would
> run on their forum, something like "Linux, ALSA, RME support". Everyb
On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 01:20:25AM +0100, CK wrote:
> I read:
> > for the record, i sent a mail to rme as well and got exactly the same
> > answer (in german) which i saw before here on this list.
>
> I still don't see the point, the GPL _protects_ their IP rights, if I
> was the evil corporation
On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 12:54:01AM +0100, Marek Peteraj wrote:
> I knew exactly it wasn't at the time i bought it, i just took it for
> granted. I talked to Thomas Charbonnel back in april at the ZKM and it
> seemed that they were positive about alsa support for fireface.
same for me, with the sub
On Fri, November 12, 2004 8:30 pm, Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano said:
> On Fri, 2004-11-12 at 01:25, Asbjørn Sæbø wrote:
>> I am working on what is called "distributed multimedia interaction", one
>> purpose of which is to investigate possibilities for ensemble playing
> See: http://ccrma.stanford
hi *,
last minute announcement:
busted2, sound installation with 7 us-police livestreams using LD_PRELOAD, realplay,
jack, hdsp, and, last but not least, linux
gallery "mount warning"
auguststrasse 10
berlin-mitte
8 p.m. CET us election party till tomorrow...
running right now.
come along!
be
On Sun, Oct 03, 2004 at 10:01:23AM -0400, Andres Cabrera wrote:
> Martin, I couldn't find anything relevant on "Spectro" or "Musikit"
> other than a readme file for neXt systems... can you point me in the
> right direction?
of course: http://www.musickit.org
originally, it was included with the
On Sun, Oct 03, 2004 at 09:56:24AM -0400, Dave Phillips wrote:
> I'm hoping that you're thinking of a realtime display, in which the
> peaks roll off to create a true waterfall effect.
sorry for being anachronistic, but a non-realtime thing is part of the
MusicKit, called "Spectro" by Perry Cook
On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 08:24:20AM -0400, Pete Bessman wrote:
> At Wed, 1 Sep 2004 09:49:36 +0100,
> Steve Harris wrote:
> >
> > Obejctive C is OK, it uses messages (smalltalk style) rather than method
> > calls, and they have some performance limitations, but the class stuff is
> > all sane.
>
>
On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 09:49:36AM +0100, Steve Harris wrote:
> Obejctive C is OK, it uses messages (smalltalk style) rather than method
> calls, and they have some performance limitations, but the class stuff is
> all sane.
i like objc very much as well, didn't have the heart to mention it
here i
On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 11:31:01AM +0100, Steve Harris wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 10:03:18 +0100, Dave Griffiths wrote:
> > so if I'm writing a osc sequencer, is the best plan to leave the
> > mapping open for the user to modify?
>
> I would say so yes, its possible that an OSC schema spe wi
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 02:46:13PM -0400, Dave Robillard wrote:
> I was wondering about this the other day - is there no OSC 'standard'
> for how to declare note-ons, offs, etc?
>
> If OSC really is to become a MIDI replacement, there's needs to be an
> explicitly defined standard that says "this
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 09:33:44PM +1000, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
> > yields me both an error. is that supposed to return true?
>
> For sf_format_check() to return TRUE, you MUST also set the sample
> rate, channel count and number of channels.
i see. thank you. missed that in the test case.
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 07:54:58AM +1000, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
> SF_ENDIAN_CPU really only makes sense when the file format allows
> bot endian-nesses.
ahh, i see, the SF_ENDIAN_* format parameters are meant to FORCE to a
specific endian-ness, and with formats supporting just one endian-ness
hi erik,
i've got a question regarding type combinations in libsndfile:
SF_FORMAT_FLOAT | SF_ENDIAN_CPU works with SF_FORMAT_AU on any
platform, which is great. but it doesn't work with neither aiff nor
wav. i expected that it would work with one of the both formats,
depending on the host endia
On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 05:06:53PM +0200, ChristianH wrote:
> Why is it so important to load the firmware?
>
> Do they put in an extra light firmware at the factory, in order to keep
> shipping weights low?
to keep shipping weights rather low, they put in NO firmware in some
hardware (just a loa
On Sat, Aug 21, 2004 at 01:56:03PM -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
> also, when i think of road driving signs used to indicate significant
> uphill or downhill sections, my recollection is that in the US and in
> Europe they obey this right=up association if they actually show the
> slope.
IIRC correctly
On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 06:07:25PM +0200, Kjetil Svalastog Matheussen wrote:
> Snd-ls is a distribution of the sound editor Snd.
excellent!
thanks a lot for that.
bests,
martin
On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 12:46:37PM -0400, Dave Robillard wrote:
> It's surprising there aren't any other nifty frontends for scsynth
> really..
there is, for those who are schemers:
http://www.alphalink.com.au/~rd/p/rfs.html
martin
On Tue, Jul 27, 2004 at 12:33:56PM -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
> >The question is, which implementation is best? All I can find is
> >Steve's liblo, libosc++, and the 'official' OSC kit. What are the
>
> afaik, libosc++ just wraps the sdk distributed by stanford. and that
> sdk is just a total nigh
On Tue, Jul 27, 2004 at 08:59:18AM +0100, Rui Nuno Capela wrote:
> > is there a hotkey for quitting qjackctl which i am overlooking? it's
> > several times i failed with just ctrl-q...
> >
>
> Alt-Q, but you have move focus to the main widget window.
stupid me... thanks.
On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 11:57:02AM +0100, Rui Nuno Capela wrote:
> If you have some ideas, speak freely! :)
is there a hotkey for quitting qjackctl which i am overlooking? it's
several times i failed with just ctrl-q...
bests,
martin
On Tue, Jul 06, 2004 at 12:33:30PM +0100, Rui Nuno Capela wrote:
> martin rumori wrote:
> >> Is anybody out there using an ATI Radeon card with DRI and DRM ?
> >
> > jackd with realtime-lsm from the cmdline is fine, with qjackctl it
> > fails. qjackctl with re
On Tue, Jun 08, 2004 at 08:12:07PM +0200, Frank Barknecht wrote:
> But then, even the GUI gurus at Apple were forced to show a
> photorealistic hard disk on the OS-X desktop. Why they did, fails
> me...
surprisingly, each single partition is shown with a photorealistic
hard disk. surprisingly, if
On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 09:40:39PM +1000, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
> Here you go:
>
> http://www.mega-nerd.com/tmp/libsndfile-1.0.10pre7.tar.gz
thanks. unfortunetaly, i can't access the file (guess a permission
thing...). but:
> I've actually found and I'm working on another bug related
On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 11:35:11PM +1000, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
> Martin, you are a MASTER of finding these weird corner cases :-).
> Well done.
thanks a lot for fixing this and for libsndfile in general!
> I will push out a full release in the next day or so.
would you mind to just put up
hi erik,
i've got another strange issue with libnsdfile (1.0.10beta6 and
earlier).
it seems to be related to SFM_RDWR mode again. if i open an existing
(but empty) file in RDWR mode, then switch to UPDATE_HEADER_AUTO mode,
then write to the file, then try to seek to the end of the file in
order
On Sun, May 16, 2004 at 02:19:29PM +1000, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
> Please try this pre-release which now works with your test program:
>
> http://www.mega-nerd.com/tmp/libsndfile-1.0.10pre6.tar.gz
thanks. i did some further testing -- seems to do the trick now.
all the best,
martin
o.k. let's complete it step by step...
On Sun, May 16, 2004 at 02:32:35AM -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
> >On Saturday 15 May 2004 16:53, Jack O'Quin wrote:
> >
> >> Can you (or anyone) name all the people in this group picture?
> >>
> >> http://www.linuxdj.com/audio/lad/contrib/zkm_meeting_2004/photo
hi *,
i've got a strange issue with libsndfile.
in foo (http://foo.sf.net) the SFM_RDWR mode is used, because target
soundfiles are created independently of the write process before, then
the file gets opened with SFM_RDWR to determine the target soundfile's
parameters (samplerate, channels...).
On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 08:15:41PM +0200, Frank Barknecht wrote:
> about what talk to visit. (Should I attend "SuperCollider3" or Joern
> and Steve's Engineering round...?) At least the concerts don't have to
should i attend barknecht's pd or should i give my talk scheduled for
the same time?
fee
On Sun, Feb 29, 2004 at 02:22:21PM +, Steve Harris wrote:
> http://plugin.org.uk/liblo/
>
> liblo is a simple to use, lightweight OSC C library implementation
looks great. sorry, don't have the time yet to test/use it. but i
will in the future.
c interfaces look really charming when define
On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 12:14:24PM +0100, Vincent Touquet wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 07:32:35PM -0500, Paul Davis wrote:
> >the implementation of DRI by certain video interface drivers means
> I was just thinking of getting an IBM thinkpad and I might want to change
> the model I want based
On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 02:18:58AM +1100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Welcome to MzScheme version 205.8, Copyright (c) 1995-2003 PLT
> > (exact? (* 0 440.0))
> #t
>
> This is explicitly mentioned in R5RS, and exact zeroes turn up all the
that's interesting. elk-scheme says about this:
>
On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 10:16:40AM +, Steve Harris wrote:
> Thanks, thats helpful. I have a number of things I'd like to use OSC for
> (and I've heard plenty of other linux audio people talking about starting
> to use it), but theres a few things that bug me about it:
>
> * Libraries not great
On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 05:27:10PM +, Steve Harris wrote:
> How about "Gaffer", both a reference to the tape beloved of all roadies
isn't that thing spelled "gaffa"? guess, there are both possibilities
and nobody really knows...
martin
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 01:56:21AM -0800, Iain Duncan wrote:
> I guess what I'm really trying to say is just that we should keep an eye to
> the future and make sure we enable the inter-app routing of HIGH resolution
> control signals through some kind of easily accessible standard if we really
> a
On Fri, Jan 02, 2004 at 02:09:05PM +0100, Florian Schmidt wrote:
> i just compiled qsynth-0.1.0 and i would lie to report on my findings:
> There's no QTDIR per se. So i exported it to be /usr. This way, the
don't know if this is the right way for qsynth, but with qjackctl the
same error occurs w
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 08:30:53PM +0100, Frank Barknecht wrote:
> Paul Davis hat gesagt: // Paul Davis wrote:
> > supercolliderJames ??? Yes
^
McCartney
btw., got OSS last year or so,
On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 09:59:11PM -0600, Jack O'Quin wrote:
> martin rumori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > senseless) as default. granting realtime privileges to everybody is
> > exactly what we don't want... and it's likely to do that by accident
> I
Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano writes:
> > > I would say (as in Kjetil's patch):
> > > echo "0">/proc/sys/kernel/setschedandmlock
> > > --> normal behavior
> >
> > I suggest picking a clearer name, like /proc/sys/kernel/realtime.
>
> I agree, sounds better. It does not say what it does as the o
> Kjetil Svalastog Matheussen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > (4) Let the user that is currently physical logged in to the machine
> > get realtime privileges.
Jack O'Quin writes:
> It does seem difficult within the context of X11 to prove that a user
> is actually local to the machine. Some p
Iain Duncan writes:
> The previously mentioned stuff at Ucapps is pretty rad. I'd even say it's
> better than any commercial options. After all, find me a commercial midi box
> with a bootstrap loader that lets me change the firmware over the serial
the stuff there is really great. i build the mi
51 matches
Mail list logo
