On Tue, 2001-11-20 at 00:14, dave willis wrote:
>
> [heavily edited out list]
> these need to all be automatically figured by the software.
>
Yes, most of them would be.
> > KernelPatches List of patches applied (PE, LL, AA, etc)
>
> this will only work (automatically) if people make su
On 19 Nov 2001, Josh Green wrote:
> On Fri, 2001-11-16 at 05:28, Andre Pang wrote:
> > This is a great idea. I actually started re-writing the latency
> > testing harness scripts because I thought they were too
> > inflexible, and I'm almost finished with the re-write. The idea
> > is to includ
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 03:08:39PM +0100, Maarten de Boer wrote:
> Sounds very good. I can provide server space to host the test results,
> and write some CGI to display them.
The current scripts I'm using are pretty similar to Benno's
scripts in his latencytest package -- i.e. they output raw H
>Sounds very good. I can provide server space to host the test results,
>and write some CGI to display them. I think the best way is to submit
>them by e-mail, having the test scripts write out an e-mailable
>form. I am not very sure though what to do with the images; are these
>really necesar
Andre Pang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I am thinking of setting up a webpage, where people can post
>> their latencytest results, so we can keep an inventory of
>> the several combinations, categorising on:
>
> This is a great idea. I actually started re-writing the latency
> testing harness s
