On 6/26/06, Jack O'Quin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
OK, I see it now. All those uninitialized write complaints are due to
the fact that jack_request_t is a union. Most requests don't need (or
want) to fill in all the bytes, just the ones that matter for that
RequestType.
There are jack_request_
On 6/26/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 26 Jun, 2006 at 10:16AM -0500, Jack O'Quin spake thus:
> libjack seems OK already, but there was an unitialied char
> written by jackd. I fixed that and committed it as [0.102.18].
>
> I don't have valgrind set up correctly on my n
On Mon, 26 Jun, 2006 at 10:16AM -0500, Jack O'Quin spake thus:
> On 6/25/06, Dave Robillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Sun, 2006-06-25 at 16:49 -0400, Lee Revell wrote:
> >> On Sun, 2006-06-25 at 16:34 -0400, Dave Robillard wrote:
> >> > On Sun, 2006-06-25 at 10:29 +1000, Erik de Castro Lopo
On 6/25/06, Dave Robillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, 2006-06-25 at 16:49 -0400, Lee Revell wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-06-25 at 16:34 -0400, Dave Robillard wrote:
> > On Sun, 2006-06-25 at 10:29 +1000, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
> > > Regardless of whether this is a bug or not it would be real
On Sun, 2006-06-25 at 16:49 -0400, Lee Revell wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-06-25 at 16:34 -0400, Dave Robillard wrote:
> > On Sun, 2006-06-25 at 10:29 +1000, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
> > > Paul Davis wrote:
> > >
> > > > they don't matter. they are the result of writing a byte to a FIFO to
> > > > wake
Lee Revell wrote:
> I have not looked closely at the code, but could it be considered an
> information leak if you're using a byte of unitialized data?
If that data is an automatic (ie stack) variable, then yes.
Erik
--
+---+
Erik de Cas
On Sun, 2006-06-25 at 16:34 -0400, Dave Robillard wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-06-25 at 10:29 +1000, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
> > Paul Davis wrote:
> >
> > > they don't matter. they are the result of writing a byte to a FIFO to
> > > wake up an(other) client. the contents of the byte do not make any
>
On Sun, 2006-06-25 at 10:29 +1000, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
> Paul Davis wrote:
>
> > they don't matter. they are the result of writing a byte to a FIFO to
> > wake up an(other) client. the contents of the byte do not make any
> > difference at any point.
>
>
> Regardless of whether this is a
Paul Davis wrote:
> they don't matter. they are the result of writing a byte to a FIFO to
> wake up an(other) client. the contents of the byte do not make any
> difference at any point.
Regardless of whether this is a bug or not it would be really
nice if this could be fixed. Fixing it means tha
