Joern Nettingsmeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> sure. the keyword is "dynamic ip" here.
>
> still, i'm trying to discourage people from doing it, since your
> machine might very well be less available than the redundant,
> diesel-backed big iron at your isp and eventually cause more bounces.
N
Jack O'Quin wrote:
Joern Nettingsmeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
as a sidenote, it is *strongly* discouraged to run your own smtp
server on a dynamic ip address that you don't exclusively own. i know
it's nice to roll your own just for the hack value, but any
responsible smtp admin out there sh
