Hi Vincent,
On Fri, Aug 16, 2002 at 01:43:03PM +0200, Vincent Touquet wrote:
> That would be a showstopper for me :)
> 1000$ is one thing, but I cannot afford 2500$+
We are always looking for cheaper alternatives.
> I'll let you know when I get a Chameleon,
> I could try to work with you to ge
On Fri, Aug 16, 2002 at 11:18:54AM +0200, Ingo Oeser wrote:
(cut)
>Price: We got them donated, but they cost about half a car, if
> you get them new, we have been told.
That would be a showstopper for me :)
1000$ is one thing, but I cannot afford 2500$+
It seems interesting though.
I'll let y
On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 09:24:31AM +0200, Vincent Touquet wrote:
> >We would write drivers for exactly the 4 modes described above,
> >so the DSP could actually just a kind of plugin to your sound
> >architecture of choice.
> Doesn't the fact that the Chameleon
> sits in a rack defeat this purpose
On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 09:25:45PM +0200, Ingo Oeser wrote:
(cut)
Ok, I grasp your intent,
its a good idea.
Letting a DSP idle is not the best idea,
so if you can use it for specific computations,
that would be nice.
>> Could you tell me exactly what you would
>> do with this board and how that
On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 12:14:12PM +0100, Steve Harris wrote:
> The big advantage (IMHO) of DSP processors is the guaranteed execution
> time, even if a current GPU can do more flops on average, you can;t rely
> on getting the same ammount of work done each block. For things like
> reverb algorith
Hi Vincent,
On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 01:58:11PM +0200, Vincent Touquet wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 09:44:23AM +0200, Ingo Oeser wrote:
> >Give our project a sample board, a data sheet and some time then
> >we'll integrate it into our Linux-DSP-Project.
> >You can find it under
> > http://o
On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 01:54:14 +0200, Vincent Touquet wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 12:14:12PM +0100, Steve Harris wrote:
> (cut)
> >The Chameleon isn't quite as convienent as it can't be applied in-line as
> >part of a LADSPA/JACK chain.
> (cut)
>
> Wait for the digital IO in the next versi
On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 09:44:23AM +0200, Ingo Oeser wrote:
(cut)
>Give our project a sample board, a data sheet and some time then
>we'll integrate it into our Linux-DSP-Project.
(cut)
I read your paper and it interests me to say the least.
The thing that is driving me to use the Chameleon
is it
On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 09:44:23AM +0200, Ingo Oeser wrote:
>Give our project a sample board, a data sheet and some time then
>we'll integrate it into our Linux-DSP-Project.
>You can find it under
> http://osg.informatik.tu-chemnitz.de/forschung/linux+dsp/index.html
I'm not sure I fully grasp t
On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 12:14:12PM +0100, Steve Harris wrote:
(cut)
>The Chameleon isn't quite as convienent as it can't be applied in-line as
>part of a LADSPA/JACK chain.
(cut)
Wait for the digital IO in the next version :)
Sure this is possible now too, but
with extra D/A -> A/D -> Chameleon
On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 09:44:23 +0200, Ingo Oeser wrote:
> Give our project a sample board, a data sheet and some time then
> we'll integrate it into our Linux-DSP-Project.
Interesting. I was interested in accelerated LADSPA for while, similar to
the accelerated VST that cards like the TC PowerC
On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 06:49:41PM +0100, Steve Harris wrote:
> > Well, it uses a standard motorola dsp.
> > I'm sure you can find a suitable compiler.
> > Then you only need an editor and a way
> > to send your data over in sysex.
> > Shouldn't be hard :)
>
> Agreed, but it runs a propriatary fr
On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 05:35:59 +0200, Vincent Touquet wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 03:52:47PM +0100, Steve Harris wrote:
> >Sadly it can't be programmed form linux (or couldn't last time I checked).
>
> Well, it uses a standard motorola dsp.
> I'm sure you can find a suitable compiler.
> Th
On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 06:44:38PM +0200, Sebastien Metrot wrote:
>Mine does :-) , but have you listened to the sample soundclips (the opera
>singer)? It sounds so bad I wonder how they expect to sell anything with
>such material.
Here it sounds good actually :)
Also expect loss of quality due t
- Original Message -
From: "Vincent Touquet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 6:41 PM
Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] [ANN] Chameleon DSP engine
> You get lowlatency without patches,
> and: does your pc has programm
On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 06:04:45PM +0200, wires wrote:
>> Very much so :)
>As a related question, how does this machine's speed compare to, say, a
>modern pc (apart from the advantages of having a display etc)?
That's comparing pears to apples ...
The DSP runs at 100 Mhz, but its a *dedicated*
pr
Quoting Vincent Touquet ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> >Anyway, that thing looks usable.
>
> Very much so :)
As a related question, how does this machine's speed compare to, say, a
modern pc (apart from the advantages of having a display etc)?
Jelle.
On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 05:26:50PM +0200, Tim Goetze wrote:
(cut)
>Anyway, that thing looks usable.
(cut)
Very much so :)
v
On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 03:52:47PM +0100, Steve Harris wrote:
>Sadly it can't be programmed form linux (or couldn't last time I checked).
Well, it uses a standard motorola dsp.
I'm sure you can find a suitable compiler.
Then you only need an editor and a way
to send your data over in sysex.
Shoul
Steve Harris wrote:
>Sadly it can't be programmed form linux (or couldn't last time I checked).
>
>- Steve
>
>On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 03:56:00 +0200, Vincent Touquet wrote:
>> http://www.soundart-hot.com/developers1.htm
Strange because they use all the GNU tools to compile the code for
that thin
Sadly it can't be programmed form linux (or couldn't last time I checked).
- Steve
On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 03:56:00 +0200, Vincent Touquet wrote:
> http://www.soundart-hot.com/developers1.htm
http://www.soundart-hot.com/developers1.htm
Remembering past threads, i know
some of you have wanted to create
a fully programmable DSP engine.
Well, it has been done.
Separate DSP & controller,
fully programmable display and IO.
SDK and everything needed to
program the beast are given
away for
22 matches
Mail list logo
