subject line, was Re: [linux-audio-dev] [ANN] First public release of Lindrum v 0.5.1

2004-03-03 Thread Dave Phillips
Greetings: Just a quick note: You should change the subject line when the discussion is no longer relevant to it. If I were looking through the list archives for info re: gAlan I'd miss this informative message... Best, dp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 08:23:16AM -0500, D

Re: [linux-audio-dev] [ANN] First public release of Lindrum v 0.5.1

2004-03-03 Thread torbenh
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 08:23:16AM -0500, Dave Robillard wrote: > On Tue, 2004-03-02 at 04:25, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 02:24:55PM -0500, Dave Robillard wrote: > > > > > > Sure, but there's always a motivation. Sometimes the projects out there > > > just don't fit your

Re: [linux-audio-dev] [ANN] First public release of Lindrum v 0.5.1

2004-03-02 Thread Jens M Andreasen
On mån, 2004-03-01 at 19:53, Dave Griffiths wrote: > On Mon, 1 Mar 2004 10:24:26 -0800, Tim Hockin wrote > > On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 12:55:14PM -0500, Dave Robillard wrote: > > > On Mon, 2004-03-01 at 07:07, guenter geiger wrote: > > > > Lack of collaboration is one of the weaknesses of the free so

Re: [linux-audio-dev] [ANN] First public release of Lindrum v 0.5.1

2004-03-02 Thread Dave Robillard
On Tue, 2004-03-02 at 04:25, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 02:24:55PM -0500, Dave Robillard wrote: > > > > Sure, but there's always a motivation. Sometimes the projects out there > > just don't fit your needs. > > > > Myself, for example: to do synthesized sounds, I want to

Re: [linux-audio-dev] [ANN] First public release of Lindrum v 0.5.1

2004-03-02 Thread torbenh
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 02:24:55PM -0500, Dave Robillard wrote: > > Sure, but there's always a motivation. Sometimes the projects out there > just don't fit your needs. > > Myself, for example: to do synthesized sounds, I want to run my > keyboard controller into a virtual analog modular synth.

Re: [linux-audio-dev] [ANN] First public release of Lindrum v 0.5.1

2004-03-01 Thread Pete Bessman
At Tue, 2 Mar 2004 01:19:00 +0100, Peter Eschler wrote: > And yes: I looked into hydrogen code. To learn. I looked into lot of > little projects code. Dead projects. To learn. And IMHO they're not > useless. Maybe my project will be dead at the end of the year. But > then i made my experience and s

Re: [linux-audio-dev] [ANN] First public release of Lindrum v 0.5.1

2004-03-01 Thread Peter Eschler
On Monday 01 March 2004 19:53, Dave Griffiths wrote: > On Mon, 1 Mar 2004 10:24:26 -0800, Tim Hockin wrote > > Also large teams are not really the answer - often one or two people work > much more effeciently due to communication overhead. I can't remember the > stats, but you have to get to quite

Re: [linux-audio-dev] [ANN] First public release of Lindrum v 0.5.1

2004-03-01 Thread Tim Hockin
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 03:20:46PM -0500, Dave Robillard wrote: > Speaking of GMPI, what's the status there anyway? Coincidentally, my > dream modular synth (and effects bay) could use a more advanced plugin > format than LADSPA... > > Is there a GMPI progress page or something like that? http:

OSS Audio development (was Re: [linux-audio-dev] [ANN] First public release of Lindrum v 0.5.1)

2004-03-01 Thread J_Zar
Alle 19:24, lunedì 1 marzo 2004, Tim Hockin ha scritto: > On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 12:55:14PM -0500, Dave Robillard wrote: > > On Mon, 2004-03-01 at 07:07, guenter geiger wrote: > > > Lack of collaboration is one of the weaknesses of the free software > > > development (peculiarly enough it is consi

Re: [linux-audio-dev] [ANN] First public release of Lindrum v 0.5.1

2004-03-01 Thread Dave Robillard
On Mon, 2004-03-01 at 14:37, Tim Hockin wrote: > On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 07:53:26PM +0100, Dave Griffiths wrote: > > > (*) Assuming smart people who could find a common vision. ;) > > > The answer is to have common stuff like JACK and LADSPA - this seems to work > > really well, and share out the

Re: [linux-audio-dev] [ANN] First public release of Lindrum v 0.5.1

2004-03-01 Thread Tim Hockin
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 07:53:26PM +0100, Dave Griffiths wrote: > > (*) Assuming smart people who could find a common vision. ;) > The answer is to have common stuff like JACK and LADSPA - this seems to work > really well, and share out the bits that appeal to different developers. I've been put

Re: [linux-audio-dev] [ANN] First public release of Lindrum v 0.5.1

2004-03-01 Thread Dave Robillard
On Mon, 2004-03-01 at 13:24, Tim Hockin wrote: > On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 12:55:14PM -0500, Dave Robillard wrote: > > On Mon, 2004-03-01 at 07:07, guenter geiger wrote: > > > Lack of collaboration is one of the weaknesses of the free software > > > development (peculiarly enough it is considered one

Re: [linux-audio-dev] [ANN] First public release of Lindrum v 0.5.1

2004-03-01 Thread Paul Davis
>The difference is, they have armys of programmers whereas the open source >apps only have a few at most with the skill to work on apps as elaborate as >say Cubase or similar. I think it would be far better to collaborate on what evidence do you have of the "armys of programmers"? my impression i

Re: [linux-audio-dev] [ANN] First public release of Lindrum v 0.5.1

2004-03-01 Thread Ken
ot; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 9:55 AM Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] [ANN] First public release of Lindrum v 0.5.1 > On Mon, 2004-03-01 at 07:07, guenter geiger wrote: > > Lack of collaboration is one of the weaknesses of the free software > > development

Re: [linux-audio-dev] [ANN] First public release of Lindrum v 0.5.1

2004-03-01 Thread Dave Griffiths
On Mon, 1 Mar 2004 10:24:26 -0800, Tim Hockin wrote > On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 12:55:14PM -0500, Dave Robillard wrote: > > On Mon, 2004-03-01 at 07:07, guenter geiger wrote: > > > Lack of collaboration is one of the weaknesses of the free software > > > development (peculiarly enough it is considere

Re: [linux-audio-dev] [ANN] First public release of Lindrum v 0.5.1

2004-03-01 Thread Tim Hockin
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 12:55:14PM -0500, Dave Robillard wrote: > On Mon, 2004-03-01 at 07:07, guenter geiger wrote: > > Lack of collaboration is one of the weaknesses of the free software > > development (peculiarly enough it is considered one of its strenghts), > > especially with audio software.

Re: [linux-audio-dev] [ANN] First public release of Lindrum v 0.5.1

2004-03-01 Thread Dave Robillard
On Mon, 2004-03-01 at 07:07, guenter geiger wrote: > Lack of collaboration is one of the weaknesses of the free software > development (peculiarly enough it is considered one of its strenghts), > especially with audio software. A weakness compared to what? Proprietary software is /definitely/ not

Re: [linux-audio-dev] [ANN] First public release of Lindrum v 0.5.1

2004-03-01 Thread Frank Barknecht
Hi, Zitat von guenter geiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Mon, 1 Mar 2004, Frank Barknecht wrote: > > Still I probably won't test Lindrum :( > > as I didn't test Hydrogen, > > I don't quite understand this attitude. Testing hydrogen would involve > apt-get install hydrogen, start it and listen to the

Re: [linux-audio-dev] [ANN] First public release of Lindrum v 0.5.1

2004-03-01 Thread guenter geiger
On Mon, 1 Mar 2004, Frank Barknecht wrote: > Still I probably won't test Lindrum :( > as I didn't test Hydrogen, I don't quite understand this attitude. Testing hydrogen would involve apt-get install hydrogen, start it and listen to the demo song. Probably soon the same will be true for lindrum.

Re: [linux-audio-dev] [ANN] First public release of Lindrum v 0.5.1

2004-03-01 Thread Frank Barknecht
Hallo, Peter Eschler hat gesagt: // Peter Eschler wrote: > Yeah, a screenie means at least it did compile ;) I know it look's ugly with > another theme. That's pointed out the webpage. Give me some time to breath, i > will work on this.. I think that with your theme the GUI actually looks real

Re: [linux-audio-dev] [ANN] First public release of Lindrum v 0.5.1

2004-03-01 Thread Steve Harris
On Sun, Feb 29, 2004 at 08:18:10 +0100, Peter Eschler wrote: > Hi LADs, > > Lindrum is an open-source drummachine that offers ten channels, realtime > control, a simple pattern sequencer and a graphical user-interface. It > currently runs under Linux only, it is developed in C++ and uses JACK, A

Re: [linux-audio-dev] [ANN] First public release of Lindrum v 0.5.1

2004-03-01 Thread Comix
Dave Robillard wrote: On Sun, 2004-02-29 at 14:18, Peter Eschler wrote: Hi LADs, Lindrum is an open-source drummachine that offers ten channels, realtime control, a simple pattern sequencer and a graphical user-interface. It currently runs under Linux only, it is developed in C++ and uses JACK,

Re: [linux-audio-dev] [ANN] First public release of Lindrum v 0.5.1

2004-03-01 Thread Jens M Andreasen
Hi Peter! I suppose you have never heard of this baby: http://www.vintagesynth.org/linn/linn2.shtml /jens On sön, 2004-02-29 at 20:18, Peter Eschler wrote: > Hi LADs, > > Lindrum is an open-source drummachine that offers ten channels, realtime > control, a simple pattern sequencer and a grap

Re: [linux-audio-dev] [ANN] First public release of Lindrum v 0.5.1

2004-02-29 Thread Peter Eschler
On Monday 01 March 2004 02:08, Dave Robillard wrote: > On Sun, 2004-02-29 at 19:23, Peter Eschler wrote: > > Aah, the toolkit! I know the discussion according Qt and other toolkits > > and i don't want to start another debate here ;) But I have to admit: I'm > > a C++ programmer and i like - no - i

Re: [linux-audio-dev] [ANN] First public release of Lindrum v 0.5.1

2004-02-29 Thread Peter Eschler
On Monday 01 March 2004 01:49, CK wrote: > I read: > > > Other than the unfortunate choice of toolkit, I'm quite excited about > > > this project. > > > > Aah, the toolkit! I know the discussion according Qt and other toolkits > > and i don't want to start another debate here ;) But I have to admit

Re: [linux-audio-dev] [ANN] First public release of Lindrum v 0.5.1

2004-02-29 Thread Dave Robillard
On Sun, 2004-02-29 at 19:23, Peter Eschler wrote: > Aah, the toolkit! I know the discussion according Qt and other toolkits and i > don't want to start another debate here ;) But I have to admit: I'm a C++ > programmer and i like - no - i love Qt. < Comment about how a qt source file isn't even

Re: [linux-audio-dev] [ANN] First public release of Lindrum v 0.5.1

2004-02-29 Thread CK
I read: > > Other than the unfortunate choice of toolkit, I'm quite excited about > > this project. > > Aah, the toolkit! I know the discussion according Qt and other toolkits and i > don't want to start another debate here ;) But I have to admit: I'm a C++ > programmer and i like - no - i love

Re: [linux-audio-dev] [ANN] First public release of Lindrum v 0.5.1

2004-02-29 Thread Peter Eschler
On Monday 01 March 2004 00:43, Dave Robillard wrote: > > Pitch controllable by MIDI eh? This makes me happy... (I'm quite > partial to using enveloped noise with varying pitch as a percussion > instrument). Hydrogen, IIRC, doesn't do anything like this, right? I don't now if hydrogen does this.

Re: [linux-audio-dev] [ANN] First public release of Lindrum v 0.5.1

2004-02-29 Thread Dave Robillard
On Sun, 2004-02-29 at 14:18, Peter Eschler wrote: > Hi LADs, > > Lindrum is an open-source drummachine that offers ten channels, realtime > control, a simple pattern sequencer and a graphical user-interface. It > currently runs under Linux only, it is developed in C++ and uses JACK, ALSA, > Qt

[linux-audio-dev] [ANN] First public release of Lindrum v 0.5.1

2004-02-29 Thread Peter Eschler
Hi LADs, Lindrum is an open-source drummachine that offers ten channels, realtime control, a simple pattern sequencer and a graphical user-interface. It currently runs under Linux only, it is developed in C++ and uses JACK, ALSA, Qt and LADSPA. More infos and downloads can be found at: http://