Re: [linux-audio-dev] [admin] new policy and moderators needed

2005-04-13 Thread Joern Nettingsmeier
Alfons Adriaensen wrote: On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 10:12:29AM +0200, Joern Nettingsmeier wrote: James McDermott wrote: I'm at my machine fairly regularly. How would the approval work? mailman web-based interface. i'll mail you the password as soon as it's all set up. If it's web-based I see no pr

Re: [linux-audio-dev] [admin] new policy and moderators needed

2005-04-11 Thread Alfons Adriaensen
On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 10:12:29AM +0200, Joern Nettingsmeier wrote: > James McDermott wrote: > > >I'm > >at my machine fairly regularly. How would the approval work? > > mailman web-based interface. i'll mail you the password as soon as it's > all set up. If it's web-based I see no problem do

Re: [linux-audio-dev] [admin] new policy and moderators needed

2005-04-11 Thread Joern Nettingsmeier
James McDermott wrote: I think that "hand-approved" in this context means just checking that cross-posts aren't spam? yep. If so, a non-kernel person like me can do this, so I'll volunteer, if you do decide to implement the scheme. cool, thanks. i'm waiting for some more feedback, but as they say,

Re: [linux-audio-dev] [admin] new policy and moderators needed

2005-04-10 Thread James McDermott
I think that "hand-approved" in this context means just checking that cross-posts aren't spam? If so, a non-kernel person like me can do this, so I'll volunteer, if you do decide to implement the scheme. I'm at my machine fairly regularly. How would the approval work?

[linux-audio-dev] [admin] new policy and moderators needed

2005-04-09 Thread Joern Nettingsmeier
hi everyone! after reading the thread "Other real-time options", it occurred to me that the strict members-only policy of this list has one huge drawback: it makes communicating with lkml and other communities almost impossible, since cross-posted threads will not make it to this list. i would li