Steve Harris wrote:
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 03:48:50 +0100, Esben Stien wrote:
OT: I think it's wrong to write the type names as plurals. A formal
categorization should not use plurals. It's the "Generator" group, not
the "Generators" group, f.ex.
Its a perosnaly preference thing, rdf types ar
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 03:48:50 +0100, Esben Stien wrote:
> Tim Goetze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Please enlighten me!
>
> RDF, so it's possible to categorize it and look it up quickly;).
>
> OT: I think it's wrong to write the type names as plurals. A formal
> categorization should not
[Giuseppe Zompatori]
>Speaking about the compile flags you use for caps -O6 does nothing
>more than -O3 and from -O2 upwards there's no need to specify
>"-funroll-loops", also -O3 often bloats the generated code
>unecessairly making it slower than -O2 AFAIK.
To tell the truth, I've never evaluated
[Esben Stien]
>Tim Goetze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Please enlighten me!
>
>RDF, so it's possible to categorize it and look it up quickly;).
>
>OT: I think it's wrong to write the type names as plurals. A formal
>categorization should not use plurals. It's the "Generator" group, not
>the "
Tim Goetze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Please enlighten me!
RDF, so it's possible to categorize it and look it up quickly;).
OT: I think it's wrong to write the type names as plurals. A formal
categorization should not use plurals. It's the "Generator" group, not
the "Generators" group, f.ex.
[Esben Stien]
>Tim Goetze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> CAPS Audio Plugin Suite [..] 0.3.0
>
>It would be great if you filled in the TYPE field;).
It might just be my pre-coffee slowness but I'm afraid I can't figure
out which TYPE field you mean ..
LADSPA, RDF, C++, or another 'TYPE' altog
Sorry for the dupes, I canceled 2 of them via the web interface
because they were being moderated, but they still made it to the
list!?!?
-Giuseppe
2006/1/11, Tim Goetze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> The ever popular CAPS Audio Plugin Suite reincarnates as v0.3.0, a
> major augmentation release.
>
> CAP
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 08:48:38 +0100, Giuseppe Zompatori wrote:
> Hello Tim,
>
> A couple of concerns with your guitar related plugs:
>
> Speaking about the compile flags you use for caps -O6 does nothing
> more than -O3 and from -O2 upwards there's no need to specify
> "-funroll-loops", also -
Hello Tim,
A couple of concerns with your guitar related plugs:
Speaking about the compile flags you use for caps -O6 does nothing
more than -O3 and from -O2 upwards there's no need to specify
"-funroll-loops", also -O3 often bloats the generated code
unecessairly making it slower than -O2 AFAIK.
Tim Goetze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> CAPS Audio Plugin Suite [..] 0.3.0
It would be great if you filled in the TYPE field;).
--
Esben Stien is [EMAIL PROTECTED] s a
http://www. s tn m
irc://irc. b - i . e/%23contact
[sip|iax]
The ever popular CAPS Audio Plugin Suite reincarnates as v0.3.0, a
major augmentation release.
CAPS is a LADSPA library that enjoys worldwide favour for its
high-quality instrument amplifier emulation facilities. In addition it
provides a sizeable assortment of no less sophisticated classic DSP
11 matches
Mail list logo
