Re: [linux-audio-dev] 2.4.x patches?

2005-12-08 Thread Tim Goetze
[Lee Revell] >You seem to be stuck in 2001. Try a 2.6 kernel, it's great! OK, one more try later, 2.6.13-rt14 does it ... and it's great indeed! jackd does 64/44.1 without xrunning even while I switch to text mode and back to X. Quite impressive -- I think I'll be stuck in 2005 for the next fe

Re: [linux-audio-dev] 2.4.x patches?

2005-12-08 Thread Lee Revell
On Thu, 2005-12-08 at 17:31 +0100, Tim Goetze wrote: > http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/ (and schedlat.html below it) seems to > have gone 404. > > Is anyone out there mirroring it? You seem to be stuck in 2001. Try a 2.6 kernel, it's great! Lee

[linux-audio-dev] 2.4.x patches?

2005-12-08 Thread Tim Goetze
http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/ (and schedlat.html below it) seems to have gone 404. Is anyone out there mirroring it? Thanks, Tim

Re: [linux-audio-dev] 2.4.x, patches and latencies

2002-01-13 Thread Dan Hollis
On Sun, 13 Jan 2002, Jussi Laako wrote: > Finally I got the my system back to 2.4.12-ac3-ll level latencies and > smoothness and it's in fact performing significantly better. > See http://www.pp.song.fi/~visitor/latencytest5/3x256.html for latency > results. (Sound driver is OSS 3.9.5f) Does ALSA

[linux-audio-dev] 2.4.x, patches and latencies

2002-01-13 Thread Jussi Laako
Hi, Finally I got the my system back to 2.4.12-ac3-ll level latencies and smoothness and it's in fact performing significantly better. See http://www.pp.song.fi/~visitor/latencytest5/3x256.html for latency results. (Sound driver is OSS 3.9.5f) Patches used against 2.4.17 are: - Andre's IDE pa