>From: Erik de Castro Lopo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>Juhana Sadeharju wrote:
>>
>> Hello. I have toyed with the following idea (no patent pending).
>
>I'm gald you're not trying to patent this idea as pror art would
>prevent it :-).
[ ... ]
>This idea of non-destructive editing has been used in the
**
I wish to fully retract this message. My mail program told me that it
wasn't sent. I more carefull read Juhana's message, and saw that he
was not misunderstanding much, if anything, at all. I tried to cancel
the outgoing messa
Juhana Sadeharju wrote:
>
> Hello. I have toyed with the following idea (no patent pending).
I'm gald you're not trying to patent this idea as pror art would
prevent it :-).
> CVS system for audio projects:
>
> The main purpose of such a system would be to allow several
> people to work with t
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>you write:
>Hello. I have toyed with the following idea (no patent pending).
>
>CVS system for audio projects:
[ ... ]
>I'm sure most of the functionality of Audio-CVS can be handled
>with the CVS.
Juhana, you are, unfortunately, once again demonstrating the proble
Hello. I have toyed with the following idea (no patent pending).
CVS system for audio projects:
The main purpose of such a system would be to allow several
people to work with the same project, and to extend the version
history control beyond the "undo/redo". The Audio-CVS could be
an external s
