Does continuous control mean continuous sound?
No, because one of the controls is often gate or amplitude.
But that is the result of some other control - by default, these things are
always on, they may be gated or muted, but they are oscillating.
(Analogue) monosynths do not have init
On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 04:14:23 -0800, Tim Hockin wrote:
I'm breaking these into two emails for the two subjects. I'm replying to
each subject in big reply - so you can see the evolution of my position :)
*** From: David Olofson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The trigger is a virtual control which
On Thursday 16 January 2003 18.39, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
[...]
2. A poly synth. Here normally 'a new note is a new note', and
things like the effect described above are not possible because
the synth does not know the relations between the existing set
of notes and any new ones. Anther
On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 01:42:27 -0800, Tim Hockin wrote:
This is very anti modular synth. NOTE/VOICE/GATE is a control type
hint. I see no reason to imply that it can only be used for a certain
kind of controls, since it's really just a name used by users
and/or hosts to match ins and
On Wednesday 15 January 2003 15.28, David Olofson wrote:
On Wednesday 15 January 2003 14.46, Steve Harris wrote:
I don't follow you at all - a new note is a new note. If your
instrument has a glissando control, use it. It does the right
thing. Each new note gets a new VVID.
I
Hi all. I joined the list today, and have been following the
vivid discussion on VVIDs with interest. On the whole, I agree
with David Olofson. There are a number of limitations in the
MIDI protocol and it should not be the model for any new API.
David Olofson writes:
On Wednesday 15 January
On Wednesday 15 January 2003 16.54, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
Hi all. I joined the list today, and have been following the
vivid discussion on VVIDs with interest.
Welcome! :-)
[...polyphony, glisando, reusing VVIDs etc...]
One thing you can't express with (polyhonic) MIDI is the following
:
On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 03:43:52 +0100, David Olofson wrote:
Another observation:
There are two ways you could start notes on a monophonic synth:
1. Use the same VVID for all notes
2. Use a new VVID for each note.
I dont think that a (typical) monosynth should have or use VVIDs
On Wednesday 15 January 2003 18.10, Steve Harris wrote:
On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 03:43:52 +0100, David Olofson wrote:
Another observation:
There are two ways you could start notes on a monophonic synth:
1. Use the same VVID for all notes
2. Use a new VVID for each note.
I dont
On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 01:07:30PM +0100, David Olofson wrote:
snip
With MIDI, this is obvious, since VVID == note pitch. It's not that
easy with our protocol, and I don't think it's a good idea to turn a
vital feature like this into something that synths will have to
implement through
On Wednesday 15 January 2003 21.56, Frank van de Pol wrote:
On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 01:07:30PM +0100, David Olofson wrote:
snip
With MIDI, this is obvious, since VVID == note pitch. It's not
that easy with our protocol, and I don't think it's a good idea
to turn a vital feature like this
I'm breaking these into two emails for the two subjects. I'm replying to
each subject in big reply - so you can see the evolution of my position :)
*** From: David Olofson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The trigger is a virtual control which really just says whether the
voice is on or not. You set up
[Lost touch with the list, so I'm trying to catch up here... I did
notice that gardena.net is gone - but I forgot that I was using
[EMAIL PROTECTED] for this list! *heh*]
Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] more on XAP Virtual Voice ID system
From: Tim Hockin (thockin_AT_hockin.org)
Date: Fri Jan
13 matches
Mail list logo
