Re: [linux-audio-dev] Demolition results, attention LADSPA developers

2003-11-17 Thread Alfons Adriaensen
On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 02:30:17PM +, Nick Lamb wrote: > Fons Adriaensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > mvclpf24.so > cs_phaser.so > (all plugins in each library) > ERROR: Label contains illegal white-space character Indeed. Seems like I've been confusing the roles of 'name' and 'label', using the la

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Demolition results, attention LADSPA developers

2003-11-17 Thread Mike Rawes
On Sun, 16 Nov 2003 18:21:08 + Steve Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 11:30:36 +, Mike Rawes wrote: > > > ERROR: port 0 is LOGARITHMIC but LowerBound isn't positive > > > > Is this really an error? Dealing with the aymptote is trivial, and > > needs to be done a

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Demolition results, attention LADSPA developers

2003-11-16 Thread Steve Harris
On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 11:30:36 +, Mike Rawes wrote: > > ERROR: port 0 is LOGARITHMIC but LowerBound isn't positive > > Is this really an error? Dealing with the aymptote is trivial, and needs > to be done anyway if a host allows the user to change the range hints. Well, LOGARITHMIC was neve

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Demolition results, attention LADSPA developers

2003-11-16 Thread Mike Rawes
On Sat, 15 Nov 2003 14:30:17 + Nick Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Here are my latest test results from running Demolition > http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~njl98r/code/ladspa/demolition.html > > 237 plugins were tested from 117 plug-in libraries, including all the > ones in BLOP, CMT, SWH, MC

[linux-audio-dev] Demolition results, attention LADSPA developers

2003-11-15 Thread Nick Lamb
Here are my latest test results from running Demolition http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~njl98r/code/ladspa/demolition.html 237 plugins were tested from 117 plug-in libraries, including all the ones in BLOP, CMT, SWH, MCP and REV. I'm disappointed to see that demolition has not been used to improve th