Hey, I'd seriously use it if it did! ;-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:linux-audio-dev-admin@;music.columbia.edu]On Behalf Of David
Gerard Matthews
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 7:59 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] Fwd: Opinions on runnin
admin@;music.columbia.edu]On Behalf Of David
Gerard Matthews
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 4:43 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] Fwd: Opinions on running VST or DirectX
plugins on Linux in real time
Mark Knecht wrote:
>Possibly , but to install PTLE you must have PTLE hardwar
David,
There seems to have been some confusion about what I was implying.
Mark
**
Mark Knecht wrote:
>PTLE has it's own hardware. No one
>talks to it except Pro Tools.
>
Not true. I've run Digital Performer, MSP, Peak, and a few other
programs on PTLE
hardware. Unlike TDM, PTLE does
>Possibly , but to install PTLE you must have PTLE hardware in the system.
>(At least using the default Windows installer from DigiDesign.) If you're
>talking about some other method of installing, then I think you're just
>pulling my leg back. ;-)
no, i meant that you don't need PT at all to run
PROTECTED]
[mailto:linux-audio-dev-admin@;music.columbia.edu]On Behalf Of Paul Davis
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 1:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] Fwd: Opinions on running VST or DirectX
plugins on Linux in real time
you don't need PT h/w to run a PT session.
> Actually, if I wanted to get my hopes up, I would have asked for Pro
>Tools running under wine. Now that would be quite an accomplishment...
>
> Being that I'm just a user type, I actually don't understand why this
>sort of thing doesn't actually work.
because the windows API that ProTools
Ardour in my
foreground. ;-)
Mark
p.s. - I though this thread was supposed to be a joke?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:linux-audio-dev-admin@;music.columbia.edu]On Behalf Of Paul Davis
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 8:21 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [linux-au
> While I don't disagree with anything you say, I think you miss the point.
>People come into the studio with PT sessions from other places. They want to
>be able to continue to run them. Even if the hardware isn't that good (and
>PTLE hardware isn't, but it isn't that bad either) it's good enoug
PROTECTED]
[mailto:linux-audio-dev-admin@;music.columbia.edu]On Behalf Of David
Gerard Matthews
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 4:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] Fwd: Opinions on running VST or DirectX
plugins on Linux in real time
Mark Knecht wrote:
>Taybin,
> So
, 2002 9:18 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] Fwd: Opinions on running VST or DirectX
plugins on Linux in real time
On Wed, 23 Oct 2002, Taybin Rutkin wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Oct 2002, Kjetil S. Matheussen wrote:
>
> > Could it be possible to
On Wed, 23 Oct 2002, Kjetil S. Matheussen wrote:
> Could it be possible to overcome all problems mentioned just by simply
> adding jack-support to the wine-server? Then someone could make a simple
> windows-program for chaining directx and vst plug-ins.
Someone has done this, I believe:
http://kt
11 matches
Mail list logo
