On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 03:43:17 -0800, Paul Winkler wrote:
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 10:42:14PM +, Mike Rawes wrote:
A text interface with tab completion (especially when there's a lot of
plugins in the network) would be a nice feature.
just to put in my 2 cents... I think a relatively
Steve Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 12:31:07 +0100, Mario Lang wrote:
Steve Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
I think Matthias Nagorni said it was a long term goal for ALSA Modular
Synth, but the gui stuff just isn't there yet.
A project where the GUI
This is something I have done a fair bit of work on myself. I have an
almost complete working engine, which allows polyphonic, multitimbral
operation, and has a mixer with a channel per part, inserts and as many
output buses as you want. No GUI code as yet (except for some old code in
a pervious
Hi,
I've nearly finished an updated DMIDI client which allows AMS, and any
ALSA 0.9 app, to be controlled remotely on a LAN. The 0.2 version just
dumps received data to /dev/midi.
I've one bug which need to be fixed and some slight refactoring of the
output side before it can be released but it
Mario,
Could you give some descriptions of a text based interface you would like to
use for realtime control of a modular synth? The building of patches seems
fairly easy (via a CLI), but I'm thinking you'd want a more direct control for
actually playing the thing - mapping the parameters to
On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 03:16:37PM +0100, Dave Griffiths wrote:
Mario,
Could you give some descriptions of a text based interface you would like to
use for realtime control of a modular synth? The building of patches seems
fairly easy (via a CLI), but I'm thinking you'd want a more direct
Dave Griffiths [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Mario,
Could you give some descriptions of a text based interface you would like to
use for realtime control of a modular synth? The building of patches seems
fairly easy (via a CLI), but I'm thinking you'd want a more direct control for
actually
Dave Griffiths [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Mario,
Could you give some descriptions of a text based interface you would like
to
use for realtime control of a modular synth? The building of patches seems
fairly easy (via a CLI), but I'm thinking you'd want a more direct
control for
On Wed, 6 Nov 2002, Mario Lang wrote:
The *.ams files looks textual to me, anyone experienced enough
with AMS able to comment on if it is remotely thinkable
to turn it into a alternatively-controllable-app? Like
a simple socket interface to change controls?
I've used AMS quite a lot - I
On Wed, 6 Nov 2002, Dave Griffiths wrote:
Dave Griffiths [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Mario,
Could you give some descriptions of a text based interface you would like
to
use for realtime control of a modular synth? The building of patches seems
fairly easy (via a CLI), but I'm
Bill Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, 6 Nov 2002, Mario Lang wrote:
The *.ams files looks textual to me, anyone experienced enough
with AMS able to comment on if it is remotely thinkable
to turn it into a alternatively-controllable-app? Like
a simple socket interface to change
On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 01:49:22 -0500, Bill Allen wrote:
On Wed, 6 Nov 2002, Mario Lang wrote:
The *.ams files looks textual to me, anyone experienced enough
with AMS able to comment on if it is remotely thinkable
to turn it into a alternatively-controllable-app? Like
a simple
Hello.
I'm a blind Linux user since 1997, and I'm also
interested in doing music on Linux.
Since I'm the synth-type-of-guy, I'd really love
to be able to play with software based synths, a little
bit of step seuqencing, and some sample based stuff.
Controlling my SuperNova DrumMachine via MIDI
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 04:39:41PM +0100, Mario Lang wrote:
I'm a blind Linux user since 1997, and I'm also
interested in doing music on Linux.
Since I'm the synth-type-of-guy, I'd really love
to be able to play with software based synths, a little
bit of step seuqencing, and some sample
What about csound? This is a command line and text based program for
handling synth stuff. Check out http://www.csounds.com
Matt
On Tue, 5 Nov 2002, Mario Lang wrote:
Hello.
I'm a blind Linux user since 1997, and I'm also
interested in doing music on Linux.
Since I'm the
Some Sequencer which is capable of MIDI out and in
SoftWerk has 100% separation between the core engine and the GUI. its
a pattern sequencer, not a timeline sequencer. It does MIDI in and out.
--p
You could also try keykit which has both a GUI and non-GUI interface.
It's at http://www.nosuch.com/keykit
Matt
On Tue, 5 Nov 2002, Mario Lang wrote:
Hello.
I'm a blind Linux user since 1997, and I'm also
interested in doing music on Linux.
Since I'm the synth-type-of-guy, I'd really
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 06:06:47 +0100, Dave Griffiths wrote:
Another possibility that might make more sense (something else I've been
thinking about) is a LADSPA only modular synth - as LADSPA plugins are much
less bound to a GUI than ssm's the interface could be much more textual.
Several
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 10:46:12AM -0600, Matt Gerassimoff wrote:
What about csound? This is a command line and text based program for
handling synth stuff. Check out http://www.csounds.com
or SAOL, which you can use on linux thanks to sfront.
sort of like new improved csound.
On Tue, 5 Nov 2002 17:47:36 +
Steve Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 06:06:47 +0100, Dave Griffiths wrote:
Another possibility that might make more sense (something else I've
been thinking about) is a LADSPA only modular synth - as LADSPA
plugins are much less
Benno Senoner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We at the LinuxSampler project,
http://linuxsampler.sourceforge.net will go the GUIless route too
and as Juan L. suggested it is probably wise to use a TCP socket because it
allows remote controllability which can sometimes be very helpful.
This is
Lance Blisters [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 04:39:41PM +0100, Mario Lang wrote:
I'm a blind Linux user since 1997, and I'm also
interested in doing music on Linux.
Since I'm the synth-type-of-guy, I'd really love
to be able to play with software based synths, a little
Paul Winkler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 10:46:12AM -0600, Matt Gerassimoff wrote:
What about csound? This is a command line and text based program for
handling synth stuff. Check out http://www.csounds.com
or SAOL, which you can use on linux thanks to sfront.
Steve Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
I think Matthias Nagorni said it was a long term goal for ALSA Modular
Synth, but the gui stuff just isn't there yet.
A project where the GUI isn't there yet? Oh, I love it already.
What is it? :)
--
CYa,
Mario
oops, omde is at
http://sf.net/projects/pythonsound
--PW
--
Paul Winkler
http://www.slinkp.com
Welcome to Muppet Labs, where the future is made - today!
On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 12:29:13AM +0100, Mario Lang wrote:
What about csound? This is a command line and text based program for
handling synth stuff. Check out http://www.csounds.com
or SAOL, which you can use on linux thanks to sfront.
sort of like new improved csound.
On Tue, 5 Nov 2002, Mike Rawes wrote:
plugins in the network) would be a nice feature. Another idea which I've
seen discussed is the creation of 'meta' plugins - subnetworks 'wrapped'
into a single plugin. Combined with cut,copy,paste, you could create a
nice patch, and then decide 'I want
I agree with your stance about merging GUI and engine code: it is a
mess and often introduces many maintenance and performance problems.
As someone who has just spent the best part of three months rewriting
code - ohh I learnt the hard way ;)
dave
iiwusynth (http://www.iiwu.org/iiwusynth/) is a command line driven soft
synth based on SoundFont instrument patch files. My program Swami
(http://swami.sourceforge.net) is a patch file editor (currently just
SoundFont files) that has an architecture that is completely separated
from the GUI. It
29 matches
Mail list logo
