On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 08:16:26 -0600
Hans Fugal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's good to know about, thanks. I googled and found your page
> http://tapas.affenbande.org/?page_id=6 which shows me how to set the irq
> handler prio, however my soundcard seems to be sharing with my video
> card. Do y
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 at 16:09 +0200, Florian Schmidt wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 16:01:12 +0200
> Florian Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Ok, I understand that. So I take it if you set qjackctl priority to 0,
> > > it will not specify it and therefore use the JACK default which is >=2?
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 16:01:12 +0200
Florian Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Ok, I understand that. So I take it if you set qjackctl priority to 0,
> > it will not specify it and therefore use the JACK default which is >=2?
> > I tried setting -P to 2 in qjackctl, and it works fine.
>
> I su
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 07:55:16 -0600
Hans Fugal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > there's no priority 0 for SCHED_FIFO threads AFAIK, thus, as jackd runs
> > at the prio specified via the comandline, the watchdog at prio +10 and
> > the clients at prio -1, you effectively get a prio of 0 for the client
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 at 15:51 +0200, Florian Schmidt wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 07:33:58 -0600
> Hans Fugal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > So you're saying jackd should run at priority 1 or higher, and we ought
> > to check for that? I could probably manage such a patch, but running at
> > prio
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 07:33:58 -0600
Hans Fugal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So you're saying jackd should run at priority 1 or higher, and we ought
> to check for that? I could probably manage such a patch, but running at
> priority 1 is what was causing this error for me with jack apps. Is
> there
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 at 08:49 -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 23:45 -0600, Hans Fugal wrote:
> > Ah! It came to me just now - I set the priority field in qjackctl to 0
> > instead of 1 (where it was) and now jack apps can start. Heads up there.
> > Maybe applications need a way to r
On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 23:45 -0600, Hans Fugal wrote:
> Ah! It came to me just now - I set the priority field in qjackctl to 0
> instead of 1 (where it was) and now jack apps can start. Heads up there.
> Maybe applications need a way to recognize what rt_priority level to ask
> for based on what jac
2.6.13.1-rt6, rlimits-patched pam and configured thus:
# in /etc/security/limits.conf
* - rt_priority 0
* - nice 0
@audio - rt_priority 50
@audio - nice -10
jack starts happily with realtime enabled, and the xruns are very few.
But no jack application will start, they all give this error:
jack_c
