Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA vs ALSA ... silent for a while

2001-06-25 Thread Benno Senoner
On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, you wrote: I want LAAGA working on OSS/Free , OSS too. That's one of the reasons why I do prefer keeping it separate. A backend for OSS is scheduled (although low priority). That's not an option. Many developers (including me) do not have the time to keep up with

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA vs ALSA ... silent for a while

2001-06-25 Thread Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano
[Abramo wrote] I think that the best solution would be the integration of ALSA with LAAGA (with obvious mutual benefits). This likely means some changes to ALSA API too. I would like LAAGA to be a fast, lean, easy to use, higher level (than the sound driver itself) API that _hides_ the

[linux-audio-dev] LAAGA vs ALSA ... silent for a while

2001-06-24 Thread Benno Senoner
On Sun, 24 Jun 2001, you wrote: I believe (as I've said several times) that OSS and ALSA are Hardware Abstraction Layers, and not anything close to a model of a generalized design for connecting multiple applications/plugins in a low latency system. They work well or even very well for