> 'scuse my ignorance - but how does it work with VST plugins?
> http://www.ohmforce.com/media/ss_OhmBoyz_funky.jpg !!!
That's definately the most compelling reason I've ever seen why NOT to
implement LADSPA GUIs
-DaveR
>In theory:
>
> VST provides a (cross-platform) library (libvstgui) that is used
> to draw pixmap GUIs. The plugin code calls UI functions.
>
>In practice:
>
> Many plugins call OS specific drawing functions.
>
>I'm not sure how automation is handled, but I dont think UI controls
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 03:31:23 +0100, Dave Griffiths wrote:
> > Its not finding a way thats the problem, its getting people to agree
> > on one.
>
> This again :)
>
> 'scuse my ignorance - but how does it work with VST plugins?
> http://www.ohmforce.com/media/ss_OhmBoyz_funky.jpg !!!
In theor
On Tue, 3 Feb 2004 14:18:59 +, Steve Harris wrote
> On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 08:49:49 -0500, Dave Robillard wrote:
> > On Tue, 2004-02-03 at 03:38, Uwe Koloska wrote:
> > > Dave Robillard wrote:
> > > > If you really want to make a custom GUI for your plugin, nothing's
> > > > stopping you from
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 08:49:49 -0500, Dave Robillard wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-02-03 at 03:38, Uwe Koloska wrote:
> > Dave Robillard wrote:
> > > If you really want to make a custom GUI for your plugin, nothing's
> > > stopping you from writing a simple jack/ladspa host that just takes
> > > input, r
On Tue, 2004-02-03 at 03:38, Uwe Koloska wrote:
> Dave Robillard wrote:
> > If you really want to make a custom GUI for your plugin, nothing's
> > stopping you from writing a simple jack/ladspa host that just takes
> > input, runs it through your plugin, and outputs via jack (this is really
> > eas
On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 02:25:54 -0600, Jack O'Quin wrote:
> > If one does not use the GTK application, then all what is available
> > are controls provided by the host.
>
> Nice. Personally, I think a socket interface would be better, though.
OSC! that way you make LADSPA plugins inside hosts O
Dave Robillard wrote:
If you really want to make a custom GUI for your plugin, nothing's
stopping you from writing a simple jack/ladspa host that just takes
input, runs it through your plugin, and outputs via jack (this is really
easy BTW) and putting whatever UI you want on it. Then your plugin w
On Mon, 2004-02-02 at 14:52, Juhana Sadeharju wrote:
> What about the following idea?
>
> My LADSPA plugin would allocate a segment of shared memory from "/dev/shm".
> That is possible because most likely all Linuxes have that device.
> Then somehow I create a backdoor for LADSPA controls. The bac
Juhana Sadeharju <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What is "/dev/shm"? How it is used? "df" shows:
> none 62812 0 62812 0% /dev/shm
On many systems it is a mount point for a tmpfs filesystem. This is
required by some POSIX shm implementations (shmopen(), etc.). I
>My LADSPA plugin would allocate a segment of shared memory from "/dev/shm".
>That is possible because most likely all Linuxes have that device.
>Then somehow I create a backdoor for LADSPA controls.
hosts are responsible for allocating memory for LADSPA controls.
Hello.
What is "/dev/shm"? How it is used? "df" shows:
none 62812 0 62812 0% /dev/shm
What about the following idea?
My LADSPA plugin would allocate a segment of shared memory from "/dev/shm".
That is possible because most likely all Linuxes have that device.
T
12 matches
Mail list logo
