Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA and Softsynths

2002-12-12 Thread Sebastien Metrot
Great link for non native English speakers! Thanks!! Sebastien - Original Message - From: "Antti Boman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, 12 December, 2002 11:21 Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA and Softsynths > > I k

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA and Softsynths

2002-12-12 Thread Antti Boman
Frank Barknecht wrote: Antti Boman schrieb: Uh, funny, doubled the mistake of wetting and not whetting. Ooops, my fault. I didn't know that those were different "w[h]et"s... I knew but you took me with you ;) There's a great site at http://www.wsu.edu:8080/~brians/errors/errors.html#errors e

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA and Softsynths

2002-12-11 Thread Frank Barknecht
Antti Boman schrieb: > Antti Boman wrote: > > Frank Barknecht wrote: > > > >> To wet your appetite: I really should finish my PD quicktoot, which > >> even in its current unfinished form is longer then three standard > >> quicktoots :( > > > > You wet my appetite so that I have to ask if there's

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA and Softsynths

2002-12-11 Thread Dave Griffiths
On Wed, 11 Dec 2002 12:09:58 +, Steve Harris wrote > On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 12:47:50 +0100, Dave Griffiths wrote: > > It also means getting midi signal routing working, as currently ssm has no > > polyphonic means of note signalling, but it's fairly trivial. The only thing > > is that it will

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA and Softsynths

2002-12-11 Thread Antti Boman
Antti Boman wrote: Frank Barknecht wrote: To wet your appetite: I really should finish my PD quicktoot, which even in its current unfinished form is longer then three standard quicktoots :( You wet my appetite so that I have to ask if there's a version online for a quick look beforehand. A qu

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA and Softsynths

2002-12-11 Thread Steve Harris
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 12:47:50 +0100, Dave Griffiths wrote: > It also means getting midi signal routing working, as currently ssm has no > polyphonic means of note signalling, but it's fairly trivial. The only thing > is that it will break the everything plugs into anything rule :( It shouldn't

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA and Softsynths

2002-12-11 Thread Dave Griffiths
On Tue, 10 Dec 2002 15:58:32 -0800, Paul Winkler wrote > On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 11:18:53PM +, Steve Harris wrote: > > I'm not quite sure how either of them handle that newfangled poly-phoney > > that seems so popular these days ;) > > AFAICT, they both punt and do everything monophonic. Ther

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA and Softsynths

2002-12-11 Thread Antti Boman
Frank Barknecht wrote: To wet your appetite: I really should finish my PD quicktoot, which even in its current unfinished form is longer then three standard quicktoots :( You wet my appetite so that I have to ask if there's a version online for a quick look beforehand. A question mark. -a

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA and Softsynths

2002-12-11 Thread Frank Barknecht
Hi, Paul Winkler hat gesagt: // Paul Winkler wrote: > PD can handle polyphony, and is about as modular as they come; > but I don't really understand PD yet. :) To wet your appetite: I really should finish my PD quicktoot, which even in its current unfinished form is longer then three standard qui

RE: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA and Softsynths

2002-12-10 Thread Richard Furse
chard -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Frank Barknecht Sent: 10 December 2002 22:51 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA and Softsynths Hi, Richard Furse hat gesagt: // Richard Furse wrote: > Just an observation ab

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA and Softsynths

2002-12-10 Thread Paul Winkler
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 11:18:53PM +, Steve Harris wrote: > I'm not quite sure how either of them handle that newfangled poly-phoney > that seems so popular these days ;) AFAICT, they both punt and do everything monophonic. PD can handle polyphony, and is about as modular as they come; but I

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA and Softsynths

2002-12-10 Thread Steve Harris
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 07:11:51PM -, Richard Furse wrote: > pure-LADSPA networks. BTW, is anyone doing this already? If so, 50% of the > code is already done. ;-) I'm thinking in terms of defining a synth using > two patches - one to define the per-note network required (e.g. > CV->osc->filter

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA and Softsynths

2002-12-10 Thread Frank Barknecht
Hi, Richard Furse hat gesagt: // Richard Furse wrote: > Just an observation about an alternative path on softsynths: a LADSPA plugin > or network can be used easily enough as a softsynth using control-voltage > (CV) approaches (a few already exist). It's just a matter of agreeing the > conventions

[linux-audio-dev] LADSPA and Softsynths

2002-12-10 Thread Richard Furse
Just an observation about an alternative path on softsynths: a LADSPA plugin or network can be used easily enough as a softsynth using control-voltage (CV) approaches (a few already exist). It's just a matter of agreeing the conventions - implementation is trivial. I've been meaning to finish writ