On 3/17/06, Andrew Gaydenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave,
I needed to have quick result in my aufio DIY-ering test, and I have got
it with (among other apps) 'om' - in spite of segfaults :-) Next time I'll
arrange a console side by side with om_gtk window to hook segfault
reason. Now I can
Denis,
Do you mean, om-engine doesn't work at all without appropriate records inside
'hosts'
file ? In my case generally it works.
=== On Saturday 18 March 2006 17:05, Denis Alessandro Altoe Falqueto wrote:
===
...
Hi, Andrew.
I was experiencing this segmentation faults every time
On 3/18/06, Andrew Gaydenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Denis,
Do you mean, om-engine doesn't work at all without appropriate records inside
'hosts'
file ? In my case generally it works.
Andrew,
To me, it was like this: the engine starts and sits down waiting for a
client to connect. But when
On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 12:02:40PM -0300, Denis Alessandro Altoe Falqueto wrote:
My /etc/hosts was like this:
127.0.0.1 localhost.localdomain localhost
I changed it to:
127.0.0.1 bach bach
And it all worked. I found the solution in the hexter homepage, at the
On 3/18/06, fons adriaensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It may be a good idea to keep the localhost entry, and *add* the
one you need.
Oh, thanks very much, Fons. I'll do that. :-)
--
---
Denis A. Altoe Falqueto
---
On Sat, 2006-18-03 at 17:45 +0300, Andrew Gaydenko wrote:
Denis,
Do you mean, om-engine doesn't work at all without appropriate records inside
'hosts'
file ? In my case generally it works.
Some people have issues with the engine not being able to communicate
with the client without a
On Sat, 18 Mar 2006 at 16:28 +0100, fons adriaensen wrote:
On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 12:02:40PM -0300, Denis Alessandro Altoe Falqueto
wrote:
when no hostname is supplied, apps IMHO should
not try to look up the local host name but just use the loopback
interface (127.0.0.1).
FWIW I'm with
On Sat, 2006-18-03 at 11:38 -0700, Hans Fugal wrote:
On Sat, 18 Mar 2006 at 16:28 +0100, fons adriaensen wrote:
On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 12:02:40PM -0300, Denis Alessandro Altoe Falqueto
wrote:
when no hostname is supplied, apps IMHO should
not try to look up the local host name but
On 3/17/06, Andrew Gaydenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lars,
Segfaults, segfaults... I have not noticed any concrete reproducable step
sequence yet,
as have tried the app rather shortly.
I really don't get it to crash for quite a few months. Please chat to
dave on irc, or submit bugreports
On Thu, 2006-16-03 at 21:26 +0300, Andrew Gaydenko wrote:
Are there alternatives for 'ams' and 'om'? My problems are:
[snip]
- 'om' engine has too many crashes (I see, it is normal, as the app is under
development).
No, actually engine segfaults are not even remotely close to normal.
I
Dave,
I needed to have quick result in my aufio DIY-ering test, and I have got
it with (among other apps) 'om' - in spite of segfaults :-) Next time I'll
arrange a console side by side with om_gtk window to hook segfault
reason. Now I can add, 'lashd' was running, DSSI scope was used besides
Are there alternatives for 'ams' and 'om'? My problems are:
- 'ams' has not text fields to type-in controls values with needed precision,
sliders are not sufficient,
- 'om' engine has too many crashes (I see, it is normal, as the app is under
development).
Anything else?
On 3/16/06, Andrew Gaydenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are there alternatives for 'ams' and 'om'? My problems are:
- 'ams' has not text fields to type-in controls values with needed precision,
sliders are not sufficient,
- 'om' engine has too many crashes (I see, it is normal, as the app is
On Thu, 2006-03-16 at 21:26 +0300, Andrew Gaydenko wrote:
Are there alternatives for 'ams' and 'om'? My problems are:
- 'ams' has not text fields to type-in controls values with needed precision,
sliders are not sufficient,
- 'om' engine has too many crashes (I see, it is normal, as the
On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 09:26:09PM +0300, Andrew Gaydenko wrote:
Are there alternatives for 'ams' and 'om'? My problems are:
- 'ams' has not text fields to type-in controls values with needed precision,
sliders are not sufficient,
- 'om' engine has too many crashes (I see, it is normal, as
Unfortunately, in case you have, say, 20-30 different plugin instances
(non-linear connected), cited (nice and known!) apps are not sutable :-(
=== On Thursday 16 March 2006 21:49, Jesse Chappell wrote: ===
On 3/16/06, Andrew Gaydenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are there alternatives for
Lars,
Segfaults, segfaults... I have not noticed any concrete reproducable step
sequence yet,
as have tried the app rather shortly.
=== On Thursday 16 March 2006 22:01, Lars Luthman wrote: ===
...
- 'om' engine has too many crashes (I see, it is normal, as the app is under
On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 08:01:49PM +0100, Lars Luthman wrote:
Anything else?
I think Csound supports LADSPAs.
So do Pd and SpiralSynthModular.
- Steve
Hallo,
Andrew Gaydenko hat gesagt: // Andrew Gaydenko wrote:
Are there alternatives for 'ams' and 'om'? My problems are:
- 'ams' has not text fields to type-in controls values with needed precision,
sliders are not sufficient,
- 'om' engine has too many crashes (I see, it is normal, as
Andrew Gaydenko:
Are there alternatives for 'ams' and 'om'? My problems are:
- 'ams' has not text fields to type-in controls values with needed
precision, sliders are not sufficient,
- 'om' engine has too many crashes (I see, it is normal, as the app is
under development).
Anything
20 matches
Mail list logo
