On 3/5/07, Ivica Ico Bukvic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Two more question have been raised in another thread :
>
> > Wouldn't it be easier then to subscribe the consortium list address to
> > LAA?
> Agreed, it would be very easy... Ico, comments are welcome.
Sorry, I missed this one.
On 3/6/07, Esben Stien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Marc-Olivier Barre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> LAA
Isn't an RSS feed more suitable for this?
This looks like a good old "why not have forums" question ;-)
Can you post an answer to an RSS feed ? nope. With LAA, one can reply
to LAU or LA
"Marc-Olivier Barre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> LAA
Isn't an RSS feed more suitable for this?
--
Esben Stien is [EMAIL PROTECTED] s a
http://www. s tn m
irc://irc. b - i . e/%23contact
sip:b0ef@ e e
jid:b0ef@
> -Original Message-
> From: Marc-Olivier Barre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, March 05, 2007 11:11 AM
> To: The Linux Audio Developers' Mailing List; A list for linux audio users
> Cc: Ivica Ico Bukvic
> Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] List migr
Hi,
Two more question have been raised in another thread :
Wouldn't it be easier then to subscribe the consortium list address to
LAA?
Agreed, it would be very easy... Ico, comments are welcome.
And by the way, it's been considered good practice to cross-post
announcements to LAA, LAU, and L
On 3/1/07, Lee Revell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/1/07, Marc-Olivier Barre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (at least for
> dictionary based random spam if such a thing exists, and I have no
> doubt it does).
>
I can verify that it certainly does exist. But the lists are
subscribers only right?
On 3/1/07, Marc-Olivier Barre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(at least for
dictionary based random spam if such a thing exists, and I have no
doubt it does).
I can verify that it certainly does exist. But the lists are
subscribers only right?
Lee
Marc-Olivier Barre wrote:
> On 3/1/07, Robin Gareus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> he might be right. a random bot is more likely to spam
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] than [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Ok, right...
>
>> a compromise woud be la-user, la-dev , la-ann -
>> or [EMAIL PROTECTED] (mailing-list), etc. (
On 3/1/07, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 05:41:49PM +0100, Robin Gareus wrote:
> he might be right. a random bot is more likely to spam
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] than [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> a compromise woud be la-user, la-dev , la-ann -
> or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 3/1/07, Robin Gareus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
he might be right. a random bot is more likely to spam
[EMAIL PROTECTED] than [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ok, right...
a compromise woud be la-user, la-dev , la-ann -
or [EMAIL PROTECTED] (mailing-list), etc. (but that's not catchy enough)
Agreed
I'
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 05:41:49PM +0100, Robin Gareus wrote:
> he might be right. a random bot is more likely to spam
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] than [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> a compromise woud be la-user, la-dev , la-ann -
> or [EMAIL PROTECTED] (mailing-list), etc. (but that's not catchy enough)
or lad,
Marc-Olivier Barre wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> As I said yesterday when I said the migration to linuxaudio.org was
> postponed till 1st April, there are still a few issues asking for
> comments.
>
> It has been suggested by a few people(Ivica Ico Bukvic, Jan Weil) that
> the email addresses [EMAI
Hi everyone,
As I said yesterday when I said the migration to linuxaudio.org was
postponed till 1st April, there are still a few issues asking for
comments.
It has been suggested by a few people(Ivica Ico Bukvic, Jan Weil) that
the email addresses [EMAIL PROTECTED] was kind of
redundant. The fol
13 matches
Mail list logo