Re: [linux-audio-dev] Memory Debugger

2002-05-23 Thread Paul Davis
>> i find the x86 hardware watchpoint way, way, way too slow to be >> useful, most of the time. on some hard problems in non-RT code, its >> the only way. in RT code, its worse than useless :( >> >> --p >> > >Really? I remember reading an Intel Pentium manual a while ago and >drooling over the d

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Memory Debugger

2002-05-23 Thread Steve Harris
On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 04:54:58 -0400, Richard C. Burnett wrote: > > I am looking for a product similar to Purify to use in Linux, any ideas? Have a look at valgrind http://developer.kde.org/~sewardj/ Only works on x86, buts its very good. - Steve

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Memory Debugger

2002-05-23 Thread Josh Green
On Wed, 2002-05-22 at 20:48, Paul Davis wrote: > > > >I just recently had the need for a good malloc debugger. I tried about 3 > >different solutions and didn't like the results I got with any of them. > >I eventually solved my problem with a gdb hardware memory watch. I wish > >I had thought of t

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Memory Debugger

2002-05-23 Thread Josh Green
On Wed, 2002-05-22 at 19:00, Andrew Morton wrote: > "Richard C. Burnett" wrote: > > > > I am looking for a product similar to Purify to use in Linux, any ideas? > > > > Everyone says valgrind is the hottest thing... > http://developer.kde.org/~sewardj/ > Wow, I just tried it. Great piece of s

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Memory Debugger

2002-05-22 Thread Paul Davis
> >I just recently had the need for a good malloc debugger. I tried about 3 >different solutions and didn't like the results I got with any of them. >I eventually solved my problem with a gdb hardware memory watch. I wish >I had thought of that first. efence seems like it might work for me, but >i

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Memory Debugger

2002-05-22 Thread Josh Green
On Wed, 2002-05-22 at 15:18, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > On Wed, 22 May 2002 16:54:58 -0400 (EDT) > "Richard C. Burnett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I am looking for a product similar to Purify to use in Linux, any ideas? > > I'm not too sure of the full specs of Purify but I have see

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Memory Debugger

2002-05-22 Thread Andrew Morton
"Richard C. Burnett" wrote: > > I am looking for a product similar to Purify to use in Linux, any ideas? > Everyone says valgrind is the hottest thing... http://developer.kde.org/~sewardj/ -

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Memory Debugger

2002-05-22 Thread Tim Hockin
> Electric Fence may cover a large portion of what Purify does. I have used > it a number of times and I found it very effective. > > Search http://freshmeat.net for it or if you use Debian: > > apt-get install electric-fence efence is necessary but not sufficient. You may also try ccmal

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Memory Debugger

2002-05-22 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
On Wed, 22 May 2002 16:54:58 -0400 (EDT) "Richard C. Burnett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I am looking for a product similar to Purify to use in Linux, any ideas? I'm not too sure of the full specs of Purify but I have seen the advertising. Electric Fence may cover a large portion of what P

[linux-audio-dev] Memory Debugger

2002-05-22 Thread Richard C. Burnett
I am looking for a product similar to Purify to use in Linux, any ideas? Rick ++---+ | T a l i t y | +--+ | ++ ++-+| | | Richard Burnett |+-+| | | Senior Des