On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 12:18:58PM +0200, Viceic Predrag wrote:
> Well, you're right. But if you want to finish with signal thats limited to
> [-1:1] you got to have some normalization somewhere..Or I'm totaly wrong?
Since everything in LADSPA (and I assume in your app) is floats, there is
nor r
> Why? What is this supposed to achieve and what's wrong with:
>
> *p_output = *p_A + *p_B;
Well, you're right. But if you want to finish with signal thats limited to
[-1:1] you got to have some normalization somewhere..Or I'm totaly wrong?
Predrag
Le Lundi, 23 Mai 2005 11.37, Erik de Cast
Richard Spindler wrote:
> It's some evil black magic that tries to avoid disortion. I'm not sure
> whether it's the right way to do, but I was inspired by some website,
> but i don't have the link anymore.
> The original code-snippet performed a similar operation on integer-data.
I can (possibly)
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 11:03:30AM +0200, Richard Spindler wrote:
> if (*p_A<0 && *p_B<0) {
> *p_output =(*p_A+1)*(*p_B+1)-1;
> } else {
> *p_output =2*(*p_A+*p_B+2)-(*p_A+1)*(*p_B+1)-3;
> }
What is th
On 5/23/05, Erik de Castro Lopo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > if (*p_A<0 && *p_B<0) {
> > *p_output =(*p_A+1)*(*p_B+1)-1;
> > } else {
> > *p_output =2*(*p_A+*p_B+2)-(*p_A+1)*(*p_B+1)-3;
> > }
>
> Why?
On 5/23/05, Steve Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've no idea what your trying to do cos I missed the original post, but
> just FYI, you will generally be better off doing x[i] rather than *x and
> incrementing x. Modern C compilers (eg. gcc 4) can vectorise array
> operations as long as you d
Richard Spindler wrote:
> On 5/23/05, Viceic Predrag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Could someone please help with this apparently simple problem?
>
> I'm not a "professional" either, but this is what I do:
> if (*p_A<0 && *p_B<0) {
> *p_output =(*p_A+1)
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 10:45:51 +0200, Viceic Predrag wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm the author of Freecycle, one of the younger FOSS audio projects out
> there.
> I have a problem that may astound by it's simplicity, so I barely dare to ask
> for help...
>
> Freecycle provides some LADSPA function
Hi,
> Is there any reason why you don't just start up two instances of the
> plugin and send each channel through its own plugin? You could replicate
> the control parameters for each channel.
Freecycle already allows the double plugin as you describe it. It's just that
sometimes someone might w
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 11:03:30 +0200, Richard Spindler wrote:
> On 5/23/05, Viceic Predrag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Could someone please help with this apparently simple problem?
>
> I'm not a "professional" either, but this is what I do:
>
> unsigned int TLData::MixChannels(float *A, flo
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 10:45:51AM +0200, Viceic Predrag wrote:
> 1) sum L and R and divide by 2 : well..
>
> 2) if L>0 and R>0 take the max, if L<0 and R<0, take the min, else add. :
> current implementation
>
> 3) add, and then normalize to the max after summation.
Options 2 and 3 are not l
Viceic Predrag wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm the author of Freecycle, one of the younger FOSS audio projects out
> there.
> I have a problem that may astound by it's simplicity, so I barely dare to ask
> for help...
>
> Freecycle provides some LADSPA functionality, and as there are lot of great
>
On 5/23/05, Viceic Predrag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Could someone please help with this apparently simple problem?
I'm not a "professional" either, but this is what I do:
unsigned int TLData::MixChannels(float *A, float *B, float* out,
unsigned int count)
/*Mix function for (-1)-(1) float
Hi all,
I'm the author of Freecycle, one of the younger FOSS audio projects out there.
I have a problem that may astound by it's simplicity, so I barely dare to ask
for help...
Freecycle provides some LADSPA functionality, and as there are lot of great
but mono ladspa effects, I need a very si
14 matches
Mail list logo
