Re: [linux-audio-dev] New form of GPL licence that protects Linuxfrom proprietary world [was: New powermacs?]t

2003-06-22 Thread Vincent Touquet
On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 10:19:21PM -0400, Ivica Bukvic wrote: >My point exactly :-). >Just to add a bit onto this issue is that we could still support >non-opensource systems, but they would need to purchase the software >(see my other e-mail with the Trolltech as an example). Dual licensing is a

RE: [linux-audio-dev] New form of GPL licence that protects Linuxfrom proprietary world [was: New powermacs?]t

2003-06-21 Thread Ivica Bukvic
> I wouldn't decline this idea so fast, i think he made a valid point. > If you watch todays software market, especially the battle between the > OSes, you can see Apple as well as M$ aquiring so-called > "Killer-Applications" which shall force people who need that Apps to > move to their OS. Espec

Re: [linux-audio-dev] New form of GPL licence that protects Linuxfrom proprietary world [was: New powermacs?]t

2003-06-21 Thread Max Nickel
Am Son, 2003-06-22 um 02.46 schrieb Tim Hockin: > > In the end, we will not reap what we have sown. Users on the OS X will > > be theoretically able to run Ardour as much as we will, especially now > > that jackd has been ported to OS X. To me, this does not seem right. > > I guess I don't see it