Re: [linux-audio-dev] Prony algorithm?

2004-07-09 Thread Christian Schoenebeck
Es geschah am Sonntag, 4. Juli 2004 23:43 als Albert Graef schrieb: > Christian Schoenebeck wrote: > > I never heard about the "Prony" algorithm, but if it does what you > > describe then it's easy to implement, isn't it? Have you tried it? Any > > problems? Or are you concerned about performance?

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Prony algorithm?

2004-07-05 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
On Mon, 05 Jul 2004 22:01:29 +0200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Albert Graef) wrote: > What where the specific problems you encountered? I've never tried > wavelets for the purpose of spectrum estimation, so it would be very > kind if you could share your experiences. The results I obtained with wavelets

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Prony algorithm?

2004-07-05 Thread Albert Graef
Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: This floated by a month or so back: http://ab-initio.mit.edu/harminv/ Thanks, that looks like a viable alternative, I'll have a look at that. I have messed with wavelets (dyadic and the discrete approximation of continuous wavelets) and I always found that they never

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Prony algorithm?

2004-07-05 Thread Albert Graef
Niklas Werner wrote: You can play around with comparing LPC and FFT results at different settings by using my software :-) http://sonasound.sf.net/ Thanks, I'll try that, too. -- Dr. Albert Gr"af Dept. of Music-Informatics, University of Mainz, Germany Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] W

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Prony algorithm?

2004-07-04 Thread Niklas Werner
Albert Graef sagte: > Alternatively, is there any other spectrum estimation method which gives > a reasonably good approximation of the main partials of a > (pseudo-)periodic signal (FFT is too bad in the lower frequencies)? Does You might want to have a closer look at linear prediction (LPC). I

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Prony algorithm?

2004-07-04 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
On Sun, 04 Jul 2004 23:43:44 +0200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Albert Graef) wrote: > Alternatively, is there any other spectrum estimation method which gives > a reasonably good approximation of the main partials of a > (pseudo-)periodic signal (FFT is too bad in the lower frequencies)? This floated b

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Prony algorithm?

2004-07-04 Thread Albert Graef
Christian Schoenebeck wrote: I never heard about the "Prony" algorithm, but if it does what you describe then it's easy to implement, isn't it? Have you tried it? Any problems? Or are you concerned about performance? No, I haven't implemented it yet. That's why I'm looking around for available s

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Prony algorithm?

2004-07-03 Thread Fons Adriaensen
On Sat, Jul 03, 2004 at 08:47:38PM +0200, Christian Schoenebeck wrote: > Es geschah am Samstag, 3. Juli 2004 14:26 als Albert Graef schrieb: > > Hi, > > > > does anyone know a library (preferably C/C++, or anything that > > interfaces to it) which implements the Prony algorithm (a.k.a. least > > sq

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Prony algorithm?

2004-07-03 Thread Christian Schoenebeck
Es geschah am Samstag, 3. Juli 2004 14:26 als Albert Graef schrieb: > Hi, > > does anyone know a library (preferably C/C++, or anything that > interfaces to it) which implements the Prony algorithm (a.k.a. least > squares fitting of a sampled signal to a sum of damped sinusoids)? I never heard abo

[linux-audio-dev] Prony algorithm?

2004-07-03 Thread Albert Graef
Hi, does anyone know a library (preferably C/C++, or anything that interfaces to it) which implements the Prony algorithm (a.k.a. least squares fitting of a sampled signal to a sum of damped sinusoids)? TIA Albert -- Dr. Albert Gr"af Dept. of Music-Informatics, University of Mainz, Germany Email