(cut)
>
>I think 2.4.14 or 15pre are ok, too. The same LL patch should work.
>
>Takashi
I have an Athlon too.
Is it true that there are issues with the lowlatency patches
(Andrew Morton's as well as the kernel pre-emption patches) and the optimizations
used in the kernel for the Athlon processo
At Thu, 15 Nov 2001 19:17:19 +0100,
Maarten de Boer wrote:
>
> > Or, will you try AA patches? It's not a bad idea, since the current
> > (vanilla) VM is based on Andrea's code. Linus still doesn't include
> > all his patches.
>
> Yes, I will try the AA patches, though I am not very sure which
>> Hmm sounds like h/w problem, then..
>> It's interesting to know where the data is contaminated, whether on
>> the driver level or transfer between capture and playback on
>> user-space, or what else..
>
>I would say on driver level: I write the data to disk right after the
>snd_pcm_readi call.
> Or, will you try AA patches? It's not a bad idea, since the current
> (vanilla) VM is based on Andrea's code. Linus still doesn't include
> all his patches.
Yes, I will try the AA patches, though I am not very sure which to use,
and on which kernel. The most recent one on a standard kernel (
At Thu, 15 Nov 2001 18:16:44 +0100,
Maarten de Boer wrote:
>
> > I've used this setting:
> >
> > echo 6 > /proc/sys/vm/vm_scan_ratio
> > echo 2 > /proc/sys/vm/vm_mapped_ratio
> > echo 4 > /proc/sys/vm/vm_balance_ratio
>
> Uuhh... I don't have these files...
> $ ls /proc/sys/vm/
> bdflush kswap
