Peter Bessman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> David Kastrup wrote:
[...]
>>> BTW, this isn't meant to equate OSS with communism. I just want to
>>> drive home the point that I did not misinterpret one iota of the
>>> Stallman verse --- I'm just tossing it in the trash bin along with
>>> my Torah.
David Kastrup wrote:
Pete Bessman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 11:06 +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
Pete complains that maybe he has listened too much to Stallman. I am
afraid if he did, he did not understand too much. Stallman is not a
person who promises superior
I think these gaps will be filled in rapidly as Linux systems with good
RT performance get more widely deployed. Once we get to the point where
you can boot the latest LiveCD from any distro and get better latency
OOTB than OSX or Windows, developers will not be able to resist.
We are still no
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 02:55:53PM -0500, Pete Bessman wrote:
> WHAT is your NAME?
Slink P.
> WHAT is your QUEST?
To have enough time to play music and hang out with my wife, enough
money to pay off my credit cards (and buy more gear), and health
insurance.
Ideological debates are pretty much
Pete Bessman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 11:06 +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
>
>> Pete complains that maybe he has listened too much to Stallman. I am
>> afraid if he did, he did not understand too much. Stallman is not a
>> person who promises superior quality of free soft
On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 11:06 +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
> Pete complains that maybe he has listened too much to Stallman. I am
> afraid if he did, he did not understand too much. Stallman is not a
> person who promises superior quality of free software: that would be
> the panacea of the "Open S
Lee Revell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 23:15 -0500, Pete Bessman wrote:
>
>> For the kind of stuff I'm interested in (see my above band
>> references to get an idea), I think it is eminently clear that
>> Linux isn't good enough. Maybe it is just me, but I have been
>> str
On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 12:05 +0100, Thorsten Wilms wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 11:15:48PM -0500, a Zombie wrote:
> *too much*
I know...
> Somewhen around the Milennium, when I had no internet access and
> didn't know shit about Linux and co, I bought Cubase VST.
> Was a great tool, except
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 11:15:48PM -0500, a Zombie wrote:
*too much*
I used to make music with just an old workstation (Korg M1),
so I was used to live with limitations. Maybe that helps
me to get along now.
Part of what I wanted to have was a good simple sampler for
Drums and some FX. Spec
On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 23:15 -0500, Pete Bessman wrote:
> For the kind of stuff I'm interested in (see my above band references
> to
> get an idea), I think it is eminently clear that Linux isn't good
> enough. Maybe it is just me, but I have been struggling intensely for
> some time to get things
On Mon, 20 Feb 2006 15:21:19 -0500, "Paul Davis"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 14:55 -0500, Pete Bessman wrote:
> > So let's hear it!
> >
> > WHAT is your NAME?
> >
> > WHAT is your QUEST?
>
> i can hack ardour part time while i work. i can hack ardour full
> time while i live t
Pete Bessman wrote:
This email is way, way longer than I intended it to be, and for that I
apologize. Remember that I'm not looking to stir up any hostilities, I
just want to hear where people stand on The Issues and get a sense of
the community. I predict that there are people here on a moral
On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 14:55 -0500, Pete Bessman wrote:
> So let's hear it!
>
> WHAT is your NAME?
>
> WHAT is your QUEST?
i can hack ardour part time while i work. i can hack ardour full time
while i live the rest of my life. but i know for sure that i definitely
can't get into philosophical deb
13 matches
Mail list logo
