[linux-audio-dev] Re: [linux-audio-user] Please test the RT rlimits patch for audio

2005-05-22 Thread Lee Revell
On Tue, 2005-04-26 at 16:32 -0400, Jody McIntyre wrote: The RT rlimits patch (nice-and-rt-prio-rlimits.patch) has been proposed as a solution to allow audio users to run their applications with realtime priorities. While more complicated to configure, it's a much cleaner patch than

[linux-audio-dev] Re: [linux-audio-user] Please test the RT rlimits patch for audio

2005-05-21 Thread Lee Revell
On Tue, 2005-04-26 at 16:32 -0400, Jody McIntyre wrote: http://www.steamballoon.com/wiki/Rlimits It appears that Linux has merged the RT rlimit patch, as of 2.6.12-rc3 or -rc4. I updated the wiki to remove the extra step of patching the kernel. Lee

[linux-audio-dev] Re: [linux-audio-user] Please test the RT rlimits patch for audio

2005-04-28 Thread Shayne O'Connor
Jody McIntyre wrote: The RT rlimits patch (nice-and-rt-prio-rlimits.patch) has been proposed as a solution to allow audio users to run their applications with realtime priorities. While more complicated to configure, it's a much cleaner patch than realtime-lsm and it's likely to get merged soon

[linux-audio-dev] Re: [linux-audio-user] Please test the RT rlimits patch for audio

2005-04-28 Thread Shayne O'Connor
Jack O'Quin wrote: Shayne O'Connor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: one thing i noticed is that whenever an audio app is started from the terminal, it prints this out: cannot lock down memory for RT thread (Cannot allocate memory) though, in regards to what i mention above, this message doesn't

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: [linux-audio-user] Please test the RT rlimits patch for audio

2005-04-28 Thread Jack O'Quin
Jack O'Quin wrote: Perhaps someone can explain how to do this using PAM. I believe you set the `memlock' option in `/etc/security/limits.conf', somehow. Shayne O'Connor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: yep, this works for me ... here are my PAM settings in limits.conf: domain type item