Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: Hammerfall latency confusion ingerman"Keyboards" articles ?

2003-11-03 Thread David Olofson
On Sunday 02 November 2003 07.09, Ivica Bukvic wrote: > > But the sample rate *was* specified to 44.1 kHz in this case, > > wasn't it...? > > Well if you wanna get *technical* about it, the hdsp tools (which > was in the screenshot) on Windows reflects the same latency values > regardless of what s

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: Hammerfall latency confusion ingerman"Keyboards" articles ?

2003-11-03 Thread Frank Barknecht
Hallo, Benno Senoner hat gesagt: // Benno Senoner wrote: > BTW: Is there a linux GUI too ? (I seem to remember that Paul D. once wrote > one for the old Hammerfall that looked like the Windows counterpart). > I hope that the Linux GUI displays the correct values. I think, hdspmixer in the alsa-t

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: Hammerfall latency confusion ingerman"Keyboards" articles ?

2003-11-02 Thread Benno Senoner
Ivica Bukvic wrote: But the sample rate *was* specified to 44.1 kHz in this case, wasn't it...? Well if you wanna get *technical* about it, the hdsp tools (which was in the screenshot) on Windows reflects the same latency values regardless of what sampling rate you use (they do not change the

RE: [linux-audio-dev] Re: Hammerfall latency confusion ingerman"Keyboards" articles ?

2003-11-01 Thread Ivica Bukvic
> But the sample rate *was* specified to 44.1 kHz in this case, wasn't > it...? Well if you wanna get *technical* about it, the hdsp tools (which was in the screenshot) on Windows reflects the same latency values regardless of what sampling rate you use (they do not change their ms rating in order