>
>And I suspect that the app writer just didn't even realize what he did. He
>may have used another sound card that didn't even allow small fragments.
>
> Linus
Oh yes and i remember very well how you told us on kernel.org some time
ago that it is up to the user space application
On Tue, 18 Dec 2001, Roger Larsson wrote:
>
> Lets see: we have >1 GHz CPU and interrupts at >1000 Hz
> => 1 Mcycle / interrupt - is that insane?
Ehh.. First off, the CPU may be 1GHz, but the memory subsystem, and the
PCI subsystem definitely are _not_. Most PCI cards still run at a
(comparativ
My tuppence worth from a real-time embedded perspective:
A shorter time slice and other real-time improvements to the scheduler will
certainly improve life to the embedded crowd. Bear in mind that 90% of
processors are used for embedded apps. Shorter time slices etc. means
smaller buffers, less
This might be of interest on linux-audio-dev too...
On Tuesday den 18 December 2001 07.09, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Dec 2001, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> > 5: 46490271 XT-PIC soundblaster
> >
> > Approximately 4 times more often than the timer interrupt.
> > That's not
