On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 06:11:12 -0700, John Lazzaro wrote:
> OS license upgrade fees, etc) is easier to make. Certainly on the
> CLI side, many people started out at Cygwin users to run emacs
> and gcc and TeX under Windows, and then decided to add a dual-boot
> option for Linux to get "the real t
> Lea Anthony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>
> Wishing for people to write native apps for a system with no market is
> like wishing Windows would die. It might happen, but it's not bloody
> likely.
However, if you port a novel Linux application to Windows or OS X,
the users on those platforms are q
>Wishing for people to write native apps for a system with no market is
>like wishing Windows would die. It might happen, but it's not bloody
>likely.
steinberg committed to neundo on beos when beos had even less market
than linux does now (*). so did several other companies. one of them, iZ,
even
Paul Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 6:18 PM
Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: The Image (usablity) problem from a
Musicians point of view
> >Hu, in fact it's the other way around: VST is a C ApI based of a very
small
>Hu, in fact it's the other way around: VST is a C ApI based of a very small
[ ... ]
sebastien - thanks a lot for the clarification. you are right about
VST being a C API in a fundamental sense, but i think it more than
notable that there are no C plugins, only C++ ones. i was simply wrong
abo
If I remember correctly, the guy that wrote the VQF (an mp3-like codec)
plugin for xmms
(home page here:http://www.csn.ul.ie/~mel/projects/linux/vqfplugin/ ) used
wine to run the windows version of the audio codec under linux. Reading form
his page he has now switched to a native version of th
>> But there are not very many "pro
>> audio" plugins under DirectX - lots of instruments and wierdo
>> enthusiast FX, but not the sort of stuff that ProTools, Nuendo and
>> Logic users are inclined towards.
>
>Waaahh!!! I would disagree. The Waves bundles are seriously good and
>goes for thousand
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 01:36:48 +0200, Benno Senoner wrote:
> Indeed the ability to run DX and VST on Linux would be a good selling
> point for pro audio on linux but there is still lot to do in the fields
> of basic audio platform infrastructure and integration of the different
> components.
I'
lnd't be able to run word or
winamp with wine without it).
Just my 0.02 euros,
Sebastien
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 3:23 AM
Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: The Ima
>> I don't know if the 3 points I've made have already been done, I'm new
>> to LAD, but they are important. Especially 3 as it gives a "migration
>> path" to existing windoze users. I know, I know, DirectX plugins are
>> written against Microsoft libraries, but how come mplayer on Linux can
>> use
> I don't know if the 3 points I've made have already been done, I'm new
> to LAD, but they are important. Especially 3 as it gives a "migration
> path" to existing windoze users. I know, I know, DirectX plugins are
> written against Microsoft libraries, but how come mplayer on Linux can
> use wind
11 matches
Mail list logo
