On 6/16/06, Bill Schottstaedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why do you say sndlib is poorly maintained? I did not get any
bug reports that I remember.
Sorry. That should have been libsndfile
--
Alex Polite
http://flosspick.org - finding the right open source
Alex Polite wrote:
On 6/16/06, Bill Schottstaedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why do you say sndlib is poorly maintained? I did not get any
bug reports that I remember.
Sorry. That should have been libsndfile
What do you mean about libsndfile being poorly maintained?
Erik
--
On 6/18/06, Erik de Castro Lopo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What do you mean about libsndfile being poorly maintained?
Not libsndfile in itself but the ruby wrapper for it.
alex
--
Alex Polite
http://flosspick.org - finding the right open source
On 6/18/06, Kjetil S. Matheussen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steve Harris:
Hum. It's maybe not tactfuly expressed, but the s-expression syntax has a
number of objectors with informed positions.
It is near one end of a broad spectrum of languages so inevitably not to
everyones taste.
Sure. Syntax
Why do you say sndlib is poorly maintained? I did not get any
bug reports that I remember.
Also, it can be used with LADSPA, but I prefer a higher level approach.
