D R Holsbeck wrote:
I guess stability is not an issue?
It's not the potential drawing card that it once was. OSX is as stable
as Linux, and even 'doze XP is getting there, from what I hear.
-dgm
To attract commercial attention, a Linux audio application would have to
offer either a unique
Paul Davis wrote:
OS X, despite being "unix", actually promotes/requires that
applications are written using an API (i.e. a set of libraries) that
bear little resemblance to anything traditionally called "unix". so
even this will not help the porting effort. in theory, the gnustep
people have a s
Mark Knecht wrote:
I'd pay regular retail prices
for any program that could compete with Logic, Pro Tools or Cubase SX on the
Linux platform.
Whoa, something Mark K. and I agree on! :) Right on!
As a user I feel a bit trapped that I can't get the software
I want today AT ANY PRICE on Linux
Paul Davis wrote:
i do know what RTcmix is. i've used it. its a really cool program. its
not the sort of thing i would use for RTP. if you do, thats great, but
most of the people who are buying software for RTP are also not
looking for software like RTcmix.
LADSPA plugin out there... Yet you s
Ivica Bukvic wrote:
That being said, I have been at least somewhat convinced that Jack is
possibly the way to go, and after some thinking, I've decided to attempt
porting RTcmix into the Jack framework. Only time will now tell whether
this was worth it or not.
Regards,
Ico
That was the mos
I seem to remember a few years back - around 1998 or so, if I recall,
that Electronic Musician magazine
ran an article on Linux. (It was called "The Penguin's Song") I read
the article, and even though there
didn't seem to be too many useful apps at that point, it got me curious.
I started usi
