On 7/26/06, Erik de Castro Lopo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Chris Cannam wrote:
> On Wednesday 26 Jul 2006 11:12, Florian Paul Schmidt wrote:
> > Well, it is very thin though. Which is not a bad thing at all. One could
> > make ue of an arbitrary amount of more advanced C++ features if desired
>
On 7/20/06, Erik de Castro Lopo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Loki Davison wrote:
> There are quite a few c++ 'not fans' on LAD. C and python all the way ;)
I used to be a Python fan but for anything larger than a couple
of hundred lines I now prefer Ocaml.
Erik
I haven't tried ocaml. I should
Loki Davison wrote:
> There are quite a few c++ 'not fans' on LAD. C and python all the way ;)
I used to be a Python fan but for anything larger than a couple
of hundred lines I now prefer Ocaml.
Erik
--
+---+
Erik de Castro Lopo
+--
On 7/14/06, Steve Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 05:16:01 -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-07-14 at 06:48 +1000, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
> > but I am not a fan nor a great user of C++. The wrapper should
> > really be written by someone with a love for the lan
