> > > you can think all you want. unless there a plugin->host callback that
> > > allows the plugin to determine its operating environment in huge detail,
> > > this kind of idea is pretty impossible to make use of.
> >
> > What?
> > Once again: misunderstood! These optimizations involve that the
2007/2/19, Camilo Polyméris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Stefano D'Angelo wrote:
> 2007/2/19, Camilo Polyméris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Stefano D'Angelo wrote:
>> > 2007/2/19, Camilo Polyméris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> >> Jeff McClintock wrote:
>> >> > >>>I actually don't know how many plugins are LTI, but,
Stefano D'Angelo wrote:
2007/2/19, Camilo Polyméris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Stefano D'Angelo wrote:
> 2007/2/19, Camilo Polyméris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Jeff McClintock wrote:
>> > >>>I actually don't know how many plugins are LTI, but, for
example, a
>> > >>>lot of delays, reverbs, choruses, eq
On Mon, 2007-02-19 at 18:10 +0100, Stefano D'Angelo wrote:
> > nope. thats not a linear arrangement of the two mono plugins, but a
> > parallel arrangement. the signal going to each instance of the mono
> > plugin is different.
>
> I'm obscure even in Italian, I can just imagine how it can sound
2007/2/19, Camilo Polyméris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Stefano D'Angelo wrote:
> 2007/2/19, Camilo Polyméris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Jeff McClintock wrote:
>> > >>>I actually don't know how many plugins are LTI, but, for example, a
>> > >>>lot of delays, reverbs, choruses, eq. filters, compressors,
>>
2007/2/19, Paul Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Mon, 2007-02-19 at 14:18 +0100, Stefano D'Angelo wrote:
> > How often are more than one plugin with the same control inputs used in
> > paralel? I was rather thinking of colapsing (or swapping) plugins in
> > series. They'd have to be linear and time
Stefano D'Angelo wrote:
2007/2/19, Camilo Polyméris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Jeff McClintock wrote:
> >>>I actually don't know how many plugins are LTI, but, for example, a
> >>>lot of delays, reverbs, choruses, eq. filters, compressors,
modulators
> >>>and "sound mixers" should be, and that's qui
On Mon, 2007-02-19 at 14:18 +0100, Stefano D'Angelo wrote:
> > How often are more than one plugin with the same control inputs used in
> > paralel? I was rather thinking of colapsing (or swapping) plugins in
> > series. They'd have to be linear and time invariant, of course.
> > Or maybe plugins c
2007/2/19, Camilo Polyméris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Jeff McClintock wrote:
> >>>I actually don't know how many plugins are LTI, but, for example, a
> >>>lot of delays, reverbs, choruses, eq. filters, compressors, modulators
> >>>and "sound mixers" should be, and that's quite enough after all.
>
> Ye
Jeff McClintock wrote:
>>>I actually don't know how many plugins are LTI, but, for example, a
>>>lot of delays, reverbs, choruses, eq. filters, compressors, modulators
>>>and "sound mixers" should be, and that's quite enough after all.
Yeah, It's a good optimization. The SynthEdit plugin API su
2007/2/18, Jeff McClintock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>>I actually don't know how many plugins are LTI, but, for example, a
>>>lot of delays, reverbs, choruses, eq. filters, compressors, modulators
>>>and "sound mixers" should be, and that's quite enough after all.
Yeah, It's a good optimization.
>>>I actually don't know how many plugins are LTI, but, for example, a
>>>lot of delays, reverbs, choruses, eq. filters, compressors, modulators
>>>and "sound mixers" should be, and that's quite enough after all.
Yeah, It's a good optimization. The SynthEdit plugin API supports
inputs being fla
12 matches
Mail list logo
