Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: why is ...

2003-02-14 Thread Jay Vaughan
PS: silent supporters are lurking behind the curtains, silent, but supportive Indeed. -- j. Jay Vaughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] music:technology:synthesizers - www.access-music.de/

Re: [Alsa-devel] Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: why is no-one responding are you all just a bunch of *^%^%^ wits???

2003-02-13 Thread Lamar Owen
On Thursday 13 February 2003 04:44, Takashi Iwai wrote: Paul Davis wrote: when ardour is in a state where i believe (rightly or wrongly) that a reasonably typical target user can sit down and just use it without encountering bugs when recording a typical 12-32 track piece, there will be

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: why is ...

2003-02-13 Thread Son of Zev
I have the same problem as Dan .. AUD doesn't convert well to USD.. all the same it looks as if I will contribute something on my next paycheck On Thu, 2003-02-13 at 07:25, Paul Winkler wrote: On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 06:21:42PM +0100, Vincent Touquet wrote: and the rest ... I get this. Its

Re: [Alsa-devel] Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: why is no-one responding are you all just a bunch of *^%^%^ wits???

2003-02-13 Thread Takashi Iwai
At Wed, 12 Feb 2003 11:49:08 -0500, Paul Davis wrote: when ardour is in a state where i believe (rightly or wrongly) that a reasonably typical target user can sit down and just use it without encountering bugs when recording a typical 12-32 track piece, there will be binaries. don't forget

Re: [Alsa-devel] Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: why is no-one responding are you all just a bunch of *^%^%^ wits???

2003-02-13 Thread Paul Davis
don't forget that the binary distribution may cause different kind of problems, too. the binary might not run on different distributions, or even on a different machine with a same distribution, unless you give all-static-linked binary. (note that even a binary like netscape 4.x cannot run

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: why is ...

2003-02-12 Thread Vincent Touquet
and the rest ... I get this. Its pathetic. Not only that ... I have no idea how much longer I can keep working on Ardour right now because working on it has come close to exhausting my financial resources. Paul, could you tell me how I can support you financially ? Do you work through Paypal ?

RE: [linux-audio-dev] Re: why is no-one responding are you all just a bunch of *^%^%^ wits???

2003-02-12 Thread Ivica Bukvic
when ardour is in a state where i believe (rightly or wrongly) that a reasonably typical target user can sit down and just use it without encountering bugs when recording a typical 12-32 track piece, there will be binaries. --p Do I/we have at least your permission (if we do manage to

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: why is no-one responding are you all just a bunch of *^%^%^ wits???

2003-02-12 Thread Paul Davis
Do I/we have at least your permission (if we do manage to compile out of CVS) to redistribute my/our compiled version? i would prefer that nobody be using ardour at this time that doesn't have the skills to use CVS and the compilation toolset. there are frequently daily updates, and i'd much

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: why is no-one responding are you all just a bunch of *^%^%^ wits???

2003-02-12 Thread Vincent Touquet
On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 12:33:24PM -0500, Ivica Bukvic wrote: Do I/we have at least your permission (if we do manage to compile out of CVS) to redistribute my/our compiled version? I think this is covered by section 6 in the GPL: http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.html 6. Each time you

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: why is ...

2003-02-12 Thread Paul Winkler
On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 06:21:42PM +0100, Vincent Touquet wrote: and the rest ... I get this. Its pathetic. Not only that ... I have no idea how much longer I can keep working on Ardour right now because working on it has come close to exhausting my financial resources. Paul, could you

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: why is no-one responding are you all just a bunch of *^%^%^ wits???

2003-02-12 Thread Vincent Touquet
On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 11:49:08AM -0500, Paul Davis wrote: (cut) jazz++ has been around for a long time, and is available as a binary. why isn't it widely loved and used? because it really isn't very good. i know that i tried to use it many times, and found it, well, frankly i found it completely

[linux-audio-dev] Re: why is no-one responding are you all just a bunch of *^%^%^ wits???

2003-02-12 Thread Paul Davis
I have done everything I have asked of me from the list, including Paul's responses ..and also taken my own initiatives following lack of response and still have recieved no response. [ ... ] Aside from being upset, it appears to me that you guys are all a bunch of hypocrites.. Asking for

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: why is no-one responding are you all justa bunch of *^%^%^ wits???

2003-02-12 Thread ljp
On Wed, 2003-02-12 at 07:44, Paul Davis wrote: So I've wasted 2+ years of my life and countless dollars continuing down this path. Do you know how much of my life and money I've spent continuing down this path? In return for getting up every day for 3+ years (bar some months in the summer)

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: why is no-one responding are you all just a bunch of *^%^%^ wits???

2003-02-12 Thread Paul Davis
If you are interested, I am sure people would pay for binaries of ardour.I would. I know other musicans that would.I could get more musicans to. Personally, I have been waiting for it since I first heard about it. Why not release something? because i am tired of downloading open source projects

Re: [Alsa-devel] Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: why is no-one respondingare you all just a bunch of *^%^%^ wits???

2003-02-12 Thread ljp
On Wed, 2003-02-12 at 09:49, Paul Davis wrote: If you are interested, I am sure people would pay for binaries of ardour.I would. I know other musicans that would.I could get more musicans to. Personally, I have been waiting for it since I first heard about it. Why not release something?