> Fast 'n dirty vs slow 'n clean is a common trade-off in a zillion > applications
And some have fast'n clean. If my src is "dirty", send me an example. I wonder if this contest is misleading -- the default sinc width I use was originally aimed at CLM-users; perhaps Eric's uses a different default, so comparisons are of apples and oranges, so to speak. I agree with Kjetil that linear resampling can be useful -- I based "Leviathan" on that effect. Sometimes "clean" isn't the main criterion.
