Steve Harris wrote:
gnoise doesn't do this, and neither does snd. i am not sure about
audacity, but i suspect it doesn't either.
Audacity, and glame use disk paging.
IMHO sweep has the best UI (speed, clarity, usability), its a shame about
the RAM thing, but maybe thats why its so fast.
- St
On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 02:18:43PM -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
> >Is this really of any use? I never recorded with sweep (I use
> >ecasound), but when I tried to load a 10 minute ogg file into sweep,
> >it refused this because of exhausted memory. I have 256 MB, that
> >should be enough for 10 minutes
Is this any better than having the file format have the markers in
it? WAVE and OGG have this. I imeplemented it in ReZound's native
format as well. (clicking around on the horizontal ruler lets you edit
the markers).The only probably is that (for ReZound) I had to make
some changes to
Thanks for your help guys! Does anyone of you guys/authors know if there
is a "standard way" to indicate marker positions of a given audio file
when starting up the process?
I mean, wouldn't it be great if each app saw -MS and -ME on the command
line to indicate the marker positions of the given
On Friday 25 October 2002 02:18 pm, Paul Davis wrote:
> >Is this really of any use? I never recorded with sweep (I use
> >ecasound), but when I tried to load a 10 minute ogg file into sweep,
> >it refused this because of exhausted memory. I have 256 MB, that
> >should be enough for 10 minutes of so
On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 02:18:43 -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
> *if* sweep uses floats or ints to represent audio data in memory (a
> big *if*) then 10 minutes of 48kHz 2 channel audio is about 219MB:
Its float internall IIRC.
> i would consider a much more fundamental problem with sweep (which the
>
"Paul Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i would consider a much more fundamental problem with sweep (which the
> author has plans to fix at some point) is the assumption that the
> audio data will fit in memory. this just isn't viable for working with
> "music" rather than "audio clips".
>
> gno
>Is this really of any use? I never recorded with sweep (I use
>ecasound), but when I tried to load a 10 minute ogg file into sweep,
>it refused this because of exhausted memory. I have 256 MB, that
>should be enough for 10 minutes of sound data. So how good is sweep
>with longer soundfiles?
*if*
Hi,
Erik de Castro Lopo hat gesagt: // Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Oct 2002 19:38:52 -0400
> David Gerard Matthews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Sweep: Loads of fun, fast, pretty, nice use of LADSPA plugins. Still
> > no way to record directly into the program from an external s
Well, I don't know why I haven't announced it here yet, but... I'm the
author of ReZound
http://rezound.sourceforge.net
check it out...
-- Davy
Lea Anthony wrote:
I'm trying to get a picture in my mind as to what is out there. Could
someone please give me a list of Wave editors that are seen
Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
On Thu, 24 Oct 2002 19:38:52 -0400
David Gerard Matthews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sweep: Loads of fun, fast, pretty, nice use of LADSPA plugins. Still
no way to record directly into the program from an external source.
Yes there is.
The little red icon/button
On Thu, 24 Oct 2002 19:38:52 -0400
David Gerard Matthews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sweep: Loads of fun, fast, pretty, nice use of LADSPA plugins. Still
> no way to record directly into the program from an external source.
Yes there is.
The little red icon/button in the bottom left corner
I just spent several hours last night comparing three different editors.
Basically, all of them have something to recommend, and
I plan on keeping all of them on my system. The skinny:
Snd: My old favorite. Easy to use, keeps getting better, but a bit
ugly still. Nonetheless, I know how to u
I'm trying to get a picture in my mind as to what is out there. Could
someone please give me a list of Wave editors that are seen as
potentially really good under Linux?
Cheers,
-Lea.
On 24 Oct 2002, Lea Anthony wrote:
>
> I'm trying to get a picture in my mind as to what is out there. Could
> someone please give me a list of Wave editors that are seen as
> potentially really good under Linux?
>
snd, http://ccrma-www.stanford.edu/CCRMA/Software/snd/snd.html (superior)
sweep,
15 matches
Mail list logo
