Bill Schottstaedt wrote:
I wonder whether there's a scientific-audio-list.
Perhaps [EMAIL PROTECTED] (oriented toward
audition rather than dsp-stuff). This address may be out-of-date
now.
The address, the website (auditory.org) and the address of the maintainer of
the webpage that mentions
I wonder whether there's a scientific-audio-list.
Perhaps [EMAIL PROTECTED] (oriented toward
audition rather than dsp-stuff). This address may be out-of-date
now.
On Thu, Aug 08, 2002 at 08:40:15PM +0200, Kasper Souren wrote:
Will Benton wrote:
Hi--
Can anyone recommend an environment or package for analysis/resynthesis?
GNU Octave could be an interesting environment to try. It's meant to be a
Matlab clone. There's also scilab, it's for free,
I prefer not to start another mailing list. Keep the interesting topics
on the same list.
-M
Kasper Souren wrote:
Will Benton wrote:
Hi--
Can anyone recommend an environment or package for analysis/resynthesis?
GNU Octave could be an interesting environment to try. It's meant to
be
Here at Ircam they mainly use Matlab, but unfortunately I'd have to be
naughty te get it running on my laptop at home. And I don't like that. So I'd
rather try to do the same stuff in Octave, which isn't straightforward.
Octave is almost as good as older versions of matlab (= 5.0). The
Martin Wolters wrote:
I prefer not to start another mailing list. Keep the interesting topics
on the same list.
-M
Kasper Souren wrote:
Will Benton wrote:
Hi--
Can anyone recommend an environment or package for analysis/resynthesis?
GNU Octave could be an interesting
On Thu, Aug 08, 2002 at 03:39:11PM -0700, Andrew W. Schmeder wrote:
(cut)
features, e.g. cell arrays, better object support, java integration. However
these days I recommend Python with Numeric/Scientific/SciPy extensions over
Octave (and over Matlab). In addition to Python's unquestionably
