> > i suppose that if i knew this was possible 2 years ago, i would never
> > have written JACK. that's the upside, perhaps. should JACK exist? is
> > the address space isolation worth it? big questions.
>
> As others have also noted, adress isolation is god sent. Whatever you do,
chiming in, ad
Tuesday 18 November 2003 15.22 skrev Paul Davis:
> >I'd like to say: woohoo!
>
> i suppose that if i knew this was possible 2 years ago, i would never
> have written JACK. that's the upside, perhaps. should JACK exist? is
> the address space isolation worth it? big questions.
>
As others have also
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 09:22:13AM -0500, Paul Davis wrote:
> i suppose that if i knew this was possible 2 years ago, i would never
> have written JACK. that's the upside, perhaps. should JACK exist? is
> the address space isolation worth it? big questions.
JACK should definitely exist, but it
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 09:22:13 -0500, Paul Davis wrote:
> >I'd like to say: woohoo!
>
> i suppose that if i knew this was possible 2 years ago, i would never
> have written JACK. that's the upside, perhaps. should JACK exist? is
> the address space isolation worth it? big questions.
In that cas
>I'd like to say: woohoo!
i suppose that if i knew this was possible 2 years ago, i would never
have written JACK. that's the upside, perhaps. should JACK exist? is
the address space isolation worth it? big questions.
>What are the arguments against stuffing the UI code in the same .so file?
wha
>> 6) [ only if we really wanted hosts to have a "real" handle on the
>>plugin GUI window ] the library would need to contain a way to
>>pass in an X "Window", and wrap it up as a native drawing area
>>for each toolkit. i would prefer not to do this for now, if ever.
>
>What about repar
I'd like to say: woohoo!
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 02:23:05 -0500, Paul Davis wrote:
> what would all this mean for LADSPA?
>
> 1) there would need to be a way to associate plugins+GUIs since we
>probably don't want them in the same object.
>
> - could be done using LRDF or a dir search p
Paul Davis wrote:
what a night (paul simon on the famous A&G concert in central park)
6) [ only if we really wanted hosts to have a "real" handle on the
plugin GUI window ] the library would need to contain a way to
pass in an X "Window", and wrap it up as a native drawing area
for each t
what would all this mean for LADSPA?
1) there would need to be a way to associate plugins+GUIs since we
probably don't want them in the same object.
- could be done using LRDF or a dir search path combined with the
plugin ID.
2) the GUI would have to declare which toolkit it was u
