Re: [linux-audio-dev] best LL kernel options with ingo molnar's patch

2005-07-09 Thread Jorge García
> After enabling the above option and kernel installation, you > need to patch PAM and configure it accordingly or you need to > try set-rtlimits. Hello, I haven't used it yet, but there is a program to give unprivileged users access to realtime scheduling via the new rlimits, avoiding the use of

Re: [linux-audio-dev] best LL kernel options with ingo molnar's patch

2005-07-06 Thread Esben Stien
Maarten de Boer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > any advice on what would be the best kernel options when using ingo > molnar's patch for an audio setup? CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT -- Esben Stien is [EMAIL PROTECTED] s a http://www. s tn m irc://irc. b -

Re: [linux-audio-dev] best LL kernel options with ingo molnar's patch

2005-07-06 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 13:52, Maarten De Boer wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for the reply. > > > > CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT: Complete Preemption (Real-Time) > > > > [...] > > > > AFAIK this one. > > Hm, I am currently trying PREEMPT_DESKTOP. > I got the impression _RT would be a bit of overkill for audio

Re: [linux-audio-dev] best LL kernel options with ingo molnar's patch

2005-07-06 Thread Maarten De Boer
> List archives. There's no point documenting it because it's developing > too fast. Ok. I gave up following the whole discussing on LKML because it was too fast :-) > If your distro has a 2.6.12 kernel available, you need to file a bug > report against PAM to support this new kernel feature.

Re: [linux-audio-dev] best LL kernel options with ingo molnar's patch

2005-07-06 Thread Christoph Eckert
> Hm, I am currently trying PREEMPT_DESKTOP. > I got the impression _RT would be a bit of overkill for > audio work. AFAIK PREEMPT_DESKTOP was introduced early in the 2.6 series. If it was enough, we didn't discuss about low latency anymore, but we do ;-) . For audio work, a latency of more th

Re: [linux-audio-dev] best LL kernel options with ingo molnar's patch

2005-07-06 Thread Lee Revell
On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 20:52 +, Maarten De Boer wrote: > > Unfortunately, I also try to get decent audio on my 2.6.12 > > machine but it seems to be tricky. > > > > After enabling the above option and kernel installation, you > > need to patch PAM and configure it accordingly or you need to > >

Re: [linux-audio-dev] best LL kernel options with ingo molnar's patch

2005-07-06 Thread Maarten De Boer
Hi, Thanks for the reply. > > CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT:      Complete Preemption (Real-Time) > > [...] > > AFAIK this one. Hm, I am currently trying PREEMPT_DESKTOP. I got the impression _RT would be a bit of overkill for audio work. > Unfortunately, I also try to get decent audio on my 2.6.12 > mach

Re: [linux-audio-dev] best LL kernel options with ingo molnar's patch

2005-07-06 Thread Christoph Eckert
> any advice on what would be the best kernel options > when using ingo molnar's patch for an audio setup? [...] > CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT:      Complete Preemption (Real-Time) [...] AFAIK this one. Unfortunately, I also try to get decent audio on my 2.6.12 machine but it seems to be tricky. Afte

[linux-audio-dev] best LL kernel options with ingo molnar's patch

2005-07-05 Thread Maarten de Boer
hello, any advice on what would be the best kernel options when using ingo molnar's patch for an audio setup? CONFIG_PREEMPT_DESKTOP: Preemptible Kernel (Low-Latency Desktop) or CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT: Complete Preemption (Real-Time) CONFIG_PREEMPT_SOFTIRQS: Thread Softirqs CONFIG_PREEMPT_HARD