On Thursday 14 August 2003 01:00 am, Brad Arant wrote:
> LADSPA is interesting but
> I do not see where it handles some of the issues of polyphonic voicing
> and assignment control.
I'm presently dealing with polyphony at the Python level (Python bindings for
my LADSPA-like system).
> Do not be
On Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 10:47:48 -0700, Tim Hockin wrote:
> It's like designing a new windowing system. You MIGHT do better, but lots
> of really smart people have done worse. I'd actively beg that anyone who
> has a lot of thoughts on this PLEASE catch up on GMPI and join in the fray.
> The XAP
On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 03:00:51PM +0200, Ingo Oeser wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 09:55:01AM +0100, Steve Harris wrote:
> > You can do it efficiently in software if you downcompile the
> > modules to a processing loop at runtime, c.f. the linuxsampler
> > project.
>
> This should be the defau
>> Would like to respond to Pete Yadlowsky...
>Thanks, Brad.
>> |- I've done away with the distinction between control signals and audio
>> |signals.
>> Early on I adopted this approach but have changed my ways as I traveled
down
>> the
>> path for a few reasons. Actually, I have made the distin
On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 12:22:06PM +0100, Steve Harris wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 09:48:45AM +0100, Steve Harris wrote:
> > I would activly encourage people who are interested in this subject to
> > learn what they are doing before entering the fray. GMPI needs more random
> > unevaluated ide
On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 01:24:50AM -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
>
> >and other controllers using (yuck) MIDI for now. LADSPA is interesting but
> >I do not see where it handles some of the issues of polyphonic voicing
> >and assignment control.
>
> it doesn't. it was never meant to. attempts to creat
On Wednesday 13 August 2003 08:09 pm, Paul Davis wrote:
> per-sample processing isn't a feasible option as a general API model
> for, oh, i'd guess at least another 3-4 years.
I'm in no particular hurry. Till then, I'll just chug along. I can't help but
find the one-sample model compellingly att
Hello,
I'm new to this mailing list, though not especially new to computer music. I
was heavily involved in it some years ago, mainly on the NeXT platform, then
fell away. Out of curiousity, I recently decided to look around and see what
was available today for Linux, audio-wise.
One of the i
>that someone may find a few of them useful, and to perhaps contribute to
>LADSPA's evolution:
LADSPA's evolution is most likely to take place within the context of
GMPI (Generalized Music Plugin Interface), a cross-industry attempt to
define a new platform and vendor independent audio/MIDI plugi
>>> and have done extensive benchmark tests and
>>> have found no degradation in performance
>
>> Yes. I believe double-precision is the standard data type used by most
>> floating-pt processors. Single-precision floats must first be converted to
>> doubles at each computation, thus actually degrad
On Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 08:09:19 -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
> >- Somewhat related to the item above, a plugin's run() method computes exactly
> >one sample at each call, not a block of samples. This is again a matter of
>
> perry cook's SDK does this too. everybody knows its cool, just as
> everybo
On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 09:55:01AM +0100, Steve Harris wrote:
> You can do it efficiently in software if you downcompile the
> modules to a processing loop at runtime, c.f. the linuxsampler
> project.
This should be the default, since compiling is fast and cheap
these days.
There could be even a
On Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 09:40:29 -0400, Pete Yadlowsky wrote:
> Yes. I believe double-precision is the standard data type used by most
> floating-pt processors. Single-precision floats must first be converted to
> doubles at each computation, thus actually degrading performance slightly.
This is
Hello Gang,
Would like to respond to Pete Yadlowsky...
|I'm new to this mailing list, though not especially new to computer music.
I
|was heavily involved in it some years ago, mainly on the NeXT platform,
then
|fell away. Out of curiousity, I recently decided to look around and see
what
|was ava
On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 09:48:45AM +0100, Steve Harris wrote:
> I would activly encourage people who are interested in this subject to
> learn what they are doing before entering the fray. GMPI needs more random
> unevaluated ideas like it needs a hole in the head.
This is a bit harsh, sorry, I di
15 matches
Mail list logo
