RE: [linux-audio-dev] image problem

2002-11-13 Thread Kai Vehmanen
On Wed, 13 Nov 2002, Mark Knecht wrote: >Let me ask another question in this area. Could someone explain the > implications of GPL/LGPL WRT proprietary applications that interface to Alsa > & Jack, along with their incumbent support programs like kaconnect and > qjackconnect? Both ALSA (alsa-

Re: [linux-audio-dev] image problem

2002-11-13 Thread Paul Davis
> Let me ask another question in this area. Could someone explain the >implications of GPL/LGPL WRT proprietary applications that interface to Alsa >& Jack, along with their incumbent support programs like kaconnect and >qjackconnect? alsa-lib is LGPL'ed, as is libjack. proprietary software can

RE: [linux-audio-dev] image problem

2002-11-13 Thread Mark Knecht
l Davis Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 8:09 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] image problem >Another difficulty with the GPL its somewhat sketchy legal basis. (OT for >LAD... Google if you want to know more). the GPL is a contract freely entered into by the copyright o

Re: [linux-audio-dev] image problem

2002-11-13 Thread Paul Davis
>Another difficulty with the GPL its somewhat sketchy legal basis. (OT for >LAD... Google if you want to know more). the GPL is a contract freely entered into by the copyright owner and the licensee. if the contract is held to be invalid, there is no contract. at that point copyright law denies e

RE: [linux-audio-dev] image problem

2002-11-12 Thread Andrew W. Schmeder
>I do not see how a company could afford to invest in this area, short of > staying closed-source. Very difficult for them, so no wonder there are few companies calling Linux developers. Another difficulty with the GPL its somewhat sketchy legal basis. (OT for LAD... Google if you want to kn

RE: [linux-audio-dev] image problem

2002-11-12 Thread D R Holsbeck
- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:linux-audio-dev-admin@;music.columbia.edu]On Behalf Of Paul Davis > Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 7:06 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] image problem > > > > Help me understand what libardour does exactly.

RE: [linux-audio-dev] image problem

2002-11-12 Thread Mark Knecht
linux-audio-dev-admin@;music.columbia.edu]On Behalf Of Paul Davis Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 7:06 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] image problem > Help me understand what libardour does exactly. It may not be the way the >code is arranged, but if I take th

Re: [linux-audio-dev] image problem

2002-11-12 Thread Paul Davis
> Help me understand what libardour does exactly. It may not be the way the >code is arranged, but if I take the libardour database and break it into two >pieces, the audio stuff and the GUI, and I obey the GPL for that code, why FYI: libardour doesn't contain any GUI code at all, or have any no

RE: [linux-audio-dev] image problem

2002-11-12 Thread Lea Anthony
On Tue, 2002-11-12 at 22:07, Taybin Rutkin wrote: > I'm not qualified to answer this, but my working definition is that the > LGPL specifically allows non-GPL programs to link to them. Since this is > the main difference from the GPL, I infer that the GPL does not allow > this. AFAIK, LGPL allows

RE: [linux-audio-dev] image problem

2002-11-12 Thread Taybin Rutkin
On Tue, 12 Nov 2002, Mark Knecht wrote: > pieces, the audio stuff and the GUI, and I obey the GPL for that code, why > does something that I write that links to it have to be GPL'ed? My code is > my code. Paul's code is his. He's made the interface public. Does the GPL > license really say that if

RE: [linux-audio-dev] image problem

2002-11-12 Thread Mark Knecht
umbia.edu]On Behalf Of Taybin Rutkin Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 12:25 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [linux-audio-dev] image problem On Tue, 12 Nov 2002, Mark Knecht wrote: > Company A takes a copy of Ardour and forks it. They do their own GUI from > scratch, maybe based

RE: [linux-audio-dev] image problem

2002-11-12 Thread Taybin Rutkin
On Tue, 12 Nov 2002, Mark Knecht wrote: > Company A takes a copy of Ardour and forks it. They do their own GUI from > scratch, maybe based on some product they already have running under OS-X or > Windows. Since the GUI is 100% theirs they don't put it under CVS. They make > improvements to the au

Re: [linux-audio-dev] image problem [was Re: [Alsa-devel] help for a levelmeter]

2002-10-18 Thread Steve Harris
On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 09:23:11 +0100, Richard Bown wrote: > The point is that selling Linux Audio isn't just about Linux Audio - > it's about selling the whole desktop. It's about letting people know > that if they want to make music they can just get on and make music. > People shouldn't h

[linux-audio-dev] image problem [was Re: [Alsa-devel] help for a levelmeter]

2002-10-18 Thread Richard Bown
On Friday 18 October 2002 04:25, Patrick Shirkey wrote: > My opinion is that there is not enough people working on the > promotional side of ALSA and Linux Audio. ALSA/LAD is too geeky and too die-hard techno hardcore to appeal to anyone but geeks. IMHO music geeks are the worst type of geeks a