On Wednesday 21 Apr 2004 7:40 pm, Paul Davis wrote:
> >Am I completely misreading the thing? To me, the spirit of the
> > GPL would seem to support that interpretation, i.e. that your
> > source code offer must include everything that a normal person
> > would otherwise lack in order to build your
>Am I completely misreading the thing? To me, the spirit of the GPL
>would seem to support that interpretation, i.e. that your source code
>offer must include everything that a normal person would otherwise
>lack in order to build your program.
I believe we can work around this by adding an ex
On Wednesday 21 Apr 2004 5:24 pm, Paul Davis wrote:
> This is an error on my part. I forgot that libwinelib.c was covered
> by an LGPL from the mono crew. The license is a bit complex:
>
>fst/fst/vstwin.c: GPL (written by torbenh and myself)
>fst/fst/.c: LGPL (written by mono but drastica
>This is a lovely piece of work. Very impressive.
Thanks. We are still looking into some outstanding issues with
it. Come learn all about it at ZKM :)
>Can you explain the licensing? The library appears at first glance to
>contain both original code and (LGPL) code from other authors, the
>wh
This is a lovely piece of work. Very impressive.
Can you explain the licensing? The library appears at first glance to
contain both original code and (LGPL) code from other authors, the
whole under a GPL licence. To build and run it requires the VST SDK,
but this is licensed incompatibly wi
On Mon, 2004-04-19 at 14:42, Tim Hockin wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 05:29:00PM -0400, Dave Robillard wrote:
> > Should we maybe organize a letter-writing campaign or something like
> > that to attempt to convince Steinberg to make VST free?
>
> My understanding was that they would do it, exce
On mån, 2004-04-19 at 21:58, Paul Davis wrote:
> Why is it called FST?
> -
>
> In case you wonder, "fst" stands for FreeST. Imagine saying "VST" with
> an odd lisp.
>
fau ess tee?
On Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 05:29:00PM -0400, Dave Robillard wrote:
> Should we maybe organize a letter-writing campaign or something like
> that to attempt to convince Steinberg to make VST free?
My understanding was that they would do it, except that the SDK doesn't
work in g++.
GMPI will (maybe) o
On Mon, 2004-04-19 at 15:58, Paul Davis wrote:
> To build the library from source, you will need the Steinberg SDK
> header files AEffect.h and aeffectx.h. These cannot be redistributed
> by us or anyone else. The configure script will tell you where to get
> them. The registration process with Ste
Torben Hohn and I are pleased to release an initial version of libfst,
a small GPL'ed C library that provides support for using win32/x86 VST
plugins (FX and VST/i) within native Linux applications, with the
assistance of the Wine project's libwine.
=
10 matches
Mail list logo
