On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 12:25:20 -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
> >So the hint we *really* need is the audio-rate control port (or
> >the control-hinted audio port :)
>
> i agree. i think this would be much more useful, since companders can
> use it for side-chain inputs. wow, how's that for a complete
On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 07:43:28 -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
> the more i try to explain this, the less convinced i am that we should
> add it. it requires the definition of a meaningless value, for a
> start, which will require warping/overloading the meaning of some
> other value (e.g. using the def
On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 07:27:33 +0100, Richard Furse wrote:
> Well, I'm *half* paying attention...
>
> So we're essentially saying that the momentary thing is a trigger that
> operates on 0->positive but not positive->0. I must admit I'm not 100% clear
> about the randomisable case from the text.
>So the hint we *really* need is the audio-rate control port (or
>the control-hinted audio port :)
i agree. i think this would be much more useful, since companders can
use it for side-chain inputs. wow, how's that for a complete turnaround?
--p
Paul Davis wrote on Fri, 12-Sep-2003:
> >Well, I'm *half* paying attention...
> >
> >So we're essentially saying that the momentary thing is a trigger that
> >operates on 0->positive but not positive->0. I must admit I'm not 100% clear
> >about the randomisable case from the text.
> >
> >Do
>Well, I'm *half* paying attention...
>
>So we're essentially saying that the momentary thing is a trigger that
>operates on 0->positive but not positive->0. I must admit I'm not 100% clear
>about the randomisable case from the text.
>
>Do we have example plugins for the two cases?
sooperlooper is
?
Cheers,
--Richard
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Steve
Harris
Sent: 09 September 2003 08:47
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] ladspa diff
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 09:54:17 -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
> lets just do it.
On 08 Sep 2003 21:28:17 -0400
Taybin Rutkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here's a ladspa diff with LADSPA_HINT_MOMENTARY and
> LADSPA_HINT_RANDOMISABLE.
>
> Comments please?
>
> Taybin
Looks good to me, although you'll need to spell-check it first
('supprising', 'unpleasent') :)
-
Myk
chard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: 09/09/03 10:25 AM
To: lad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] ladspa diff
>
> On Tue, 8 Sep 2003, Taybin Rutkin wrote:
> Here's a ladspa diff with LADSPA_HINT_MOMENTARY and
> LADSPA_HINT_RANDOMISA
Steve Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 09:54:17 -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
> > lets just do it. i think that personally steve harris should be the
> > final arbiter of this stuff, after consulting with this list. he's
> > done more with LADSPA than almost anyone else (per
On Tue, 8 Sep 2003, Taybin Rutkin wrote:
> Here's a ladspa diff with LADSPA_HINT_MOMENTARY and
> LADSPA_HINT_RANDOMISABLE.
>
> Comments please?
What is LADSPA_HINT_RANDOMISABLE actually useful for?
Richard.
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 09:54:17 -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
> lets just do it. i think that personally steve harris should be the
> final arbiter of this stuff, after consulting with this list. he's
> done more with LADSPA than almost anyone else (perhaps than anyone
> else). we've discussed these ch
lets just do it. i think that personally steve harris should be the
final arbiter of this stuff, after consulting with this list. he's
done more with LADSPA than almost anyone else (perhaps than anyone
else). we've discussed these changes for a while, and IIRC nobody had
any objections.
i'm willin
Here's a ladspa diff with LADSPA_HINT_MOMENTARY and
LADSPA_HINT_RANDOMISABLE.
Comments please?
Taybin
--- /usr/include/ladspa.h 2003-04-05 01:10:32.0 -0500
+++ ladspa-1.2.h2003-09-08 21:24:05.0 -0400
@@ -22,9 +22,9 @@
#ifndef LADSPA_INCLUDED
#define LADSPA_INCLUDED
14 matches
Mail list logo
