On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 07:26:20AM -0600, Hans Fugal wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Apr 2006 at 10:07 +0100, Steve Harris wrote:
> > I'd like to see LADSPA 2.0 plugins always being directories, wether we go
> > for bundles or not. It gives the plugin somewhere to stash its auxilarry
> > data (precompiled tabl
On Tue, 25 Apr 2006 at 10:07 +0100, Steve Harris wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 12:44:03PM -0400, Taybin Rutkin wrote:
> > I like the bundle idea. What are the reasons to not use it? Reasons to
> > use it include ease of distribution (especially on other platforms like
> > osx).
> >
> > I th
On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 12:44:03PM -0400, Taybin Rutkin wrote:
> I like the bundle idea. What are the reasons to not use it? Reasons to use
> it include ease of distribution (especially on other platforms like osx).
>
> I think bundles are a great idea that should be adopted by other unixen.
>
I like the bundle idea. What are the reasons to not use it? Reasons to use it
include ease of distribution (especially on other platforms like osx).
I think bundles are a great idea that should be adopted by other unixen.
Or, can we make it so that bundles are a possible method of distribution