Re: [linux-audio-dev] ladspa2 and bundles

2006-04-25 Thread Steve Harris
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 07:26:20AM -0600, Hans Fugal wrote: > On Tue, 25 Apr 2006 at 10:07 +0100, Steve Harris wrote: > > I'd like to see LADSPA 2.0 plugins always being directories, wether we go > > for bundles or not. It gives the plugin somewhere to stash its auxilarry > > data (precompiled tabl

Re: [linux-audio-dev] ladspa2 and bundles

2006-04-25 Thread Hans Fugal
On Tue, 25 Apr 2006 at 10:07 +0100, Steve Harris wrote: > On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 12:44:03PM -0400, Taybin Rutkin wrote: > > I like the bundle idea. What are the reasons to not use it? Reasons to > > use it include ease of distribution (especially on other platforms like > > osx). > > > > I th

Re: [linux-audio-dev] ladspa2 and bundles

2006-04-25 Thread Steve Harris
On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 12:44:03PM -0400, Taybin Rutkin wrote: > I like the bundle idea. What are the reasons to not use it? Reasons to use > it include ease of distribution (especially on other platforms like osx). > > I think bundles are a great idea that should be adopted by other unixen. >

[linux-audio-dev] ladspa2 and bundles

2006-04-24 Thread Taybin Rutkin
I like the bundle idea. What are the reasons to not use it? Reasons to use it include ease of distribution (especially on other platforms like osx). I think bundles are a great idea that should be adopted by other unixen. Or, can we make it so that bundles are a possible method of distribution