Re: [linux-audio-dev] latencytest results webpage

2001-11-22 Thread Josh Green
On Thu, 2001-11-22 at 02:03, Frank Neumann wrote: > > Hi, > Josh wrote: > > [..] > > > > Hope you had a nice time around the world after the LinuxTag, Josh. > > > > > > > I did, it was an awesome trip through Europe. I hope to return again > > someday :) Where are those LAD LinuxTag pictures t

Re: [linux-audio-dev] latencytest results webpage

2001-11-22 Thread Frank Neumann
Hi, Josh wrote: [..] > > Hope you had a nice time around the world after the LinuxTag, Josh. > > > > I did, it was an awesome trip through Europe. I hope to return again > someday :) Where are those LAD LinuxTag pictures that Frank Neumann > posted? Perhaps it was never mentioned on the LAD li

Re: [linux-audio-dev] latencytest results webpage

2001-11-21 Thread Josh Green
On Wed, 2001-11-21 at 07:09, Tobias Ulbricht wrote: > > i wonder: we hab some different latency test programs, "latencytest" from > Benno and the "latency" from alsa, and maybe others? > - maybe we should categorize them and/or choose only one which will do the > job. If there is a bug in the

Re: [linux-audio-dev] latencytest results webpage

2001-11-21 Thread Tobias Ulbricht
[snip] > TestVersion Latencytest version > TestFrags # of audio fragments during test > TestFragSize Size of each audio fragment > TestFileSize Size of file for disk tests > TestList List of tests performed (example: "X, proc, write, read, copy") my 2 p. i wonder: we hab some diff

Re: [Alsa-devel] Re: [linux-audio-dev] latencytest results webpage

2001-11-20 Thread Josh Green
On Tue, 2001-11-20 at 00:14, dave willis wrote: > > [heavily edited out list] > these need to all be automatically figured by the software. > Yes, most of them would be. > > KernelPatches List of patches applied (PE, LL, AA, etc) > > this will only work (automatically) if people make su

Re: [Alsa-devel] Re: [linux-audio-dev] latencytest results webpage

2001-11-20 Thread dave willis
On 19 Nov 2001, Josh Green wrote: > On Fri, 2001-11-16 at 05:28, Andre Pang wrote: > > This is a great idea. I actually started re-writing the latency > > testing harness scripts because I thought they were too > > inflexible, and I'm almost finished with the re-write. The idea > > is to includ

Re: [linux-audio-dev] latencytest results webpage

2001-11-20 Thread Josh Green
On Fri, 2001-11-16 at 05:28, Andre Pang wrote: > On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 10:26:23AM +0100, Maarten de Boer wrote: > > > I am thinking of setting up a webpage, where people can post > > their latencytest results, so we can keep an inventory of > > the several combinations, categorising on: > > Th

Re: [Alsa-devel] Re: [linux-audio-dev] latencytest results webpage

2001-11-17 Thread Andre Pang
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 03:08:39PM +0100, Maarten de Boer wrote: > Sounds very good. I can provide server space to host the test results, > and write some CGI to display them. The current scripts I'm using are pretty similar to Benno's scripts in his latencytest package -- i.e. they output raw H

Re: [Alsa-devel] Re: [linux-audio-dev] latencytest results webpage

2001-11-16 Thread Patrick Shirkey
>Sounds very good. I can provide server space to host the test results, >and write some CGI to display them. I think the best way is to submit >them by e-mail, having the test scripts write out an e-mailable >form. I am not very sure though what to do with the images; are these >really necesar

Re: [Alsa-devel] Re: [linux-audio-dev] latencytest results webpage

2001-11-16 Thread Maarten de Boer
Andre Pang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I am thinking of setting up a webpage, where people can post >> their latencytest results, so we can keep an inventory of >> the several combinations, categorising on: > > This is a great idea. I actually started re-writing the latency > testing harness s

Re: [linux-audio-dev] latencytest results webpage

2001-11-16 Thread Andre Pang
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 10:26:23AM +0100, Maarten de Boer wrote: > I am thinking of setting up a webpage, where people can post > their latencytest results, so we can keep an inventory of > the several combinations, categorising on: This is a great idea. I actually started re-writing the latenc

Re: [linux-audio-dev] latencytest results webpage

2001-11-16 Thread Vincent Touquet
Well of course :) Can you also put there a comprehensive mini-howto about how we should run which test to get these results ? kind regards vini On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 10:26:23AM +0100, Maarten de Boer wrote: >Hello, > >I am thinking of setting up a webpage, where people can post >their latency

[linux-audio-dev] latencytest results webpage

2001-11-16 Thread Maarten de Boer
Hello, I am thinking of setting up a webpage, where people can post their latencytest results, so we can keep an inventory of the several combinations, categorising on: - processor - SMP - kernel version - kernel patch - kernel configuration --- processor --- SMP --- ?? - tuning --- vm --- hdp