Re: [linux-audio-dev] newest audio server for Linux (yep, yetanother)

2003-02-05 Thread Bob Ham
On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 14:19, Phil Burk wrote: > > Bjarne Stroustrup who said something along the > > lines of "Every use of a define is an instance of a programmer not > > programming correctly." > > Gee, thanks. I just found it odd that there were *typed* defines and wondered if there was any p

Re: [linux-audio-dev] newest audio server for Linux (yep, yetanother)

2003-02-05 Thread Josh Haberman
On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 06:39, Fred Gleason wrote: > On Tuesday 04 February 2003 21:03, David Olofson wrote: > > > OTOH, I'll need a nice replacement for the ALSA sequencer, if the > > thing is to be usable for anything but music and SFX playback on > > other platforms. Currently, the most "portable

Re: [linux-audio-dev] newest audio server for Linux (yep, yetanother)

2003-02-05 Thread Bob Ham
On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 00:26, Josh Haberman wrote: > On Tue, 2003-02-04 at 13:41, Bob Ham wrote: > > On Tue, 2003-02-04 at 20:47, Josh Haberman wrote: > > > > > Imagine being able to write to an API as simple and well-designed as > > > this:

Re: [linux-audio-dev] newest audio server for Linux (yep, yetanother)

2003-02-04 Thread Josh Haberman
On Tue, 2003-02-04 at 18:03, David Olofson wrote: > Would be cool if even more platforms were supported, but OTOH, in the > case of Audiality, that's mostly for games that use it as a sound > engine - and SDL works fine for that. What platforms are not supported that you would like to see? Ther

Re: [linux-audio-dev] newest audio server for Linux (yep, yetanother)

2003-02-04 Thread Josh Haberman
On Tue, 2003-02-04 at 13:41, Bob Ham wrote: > On Tue, 2003-02-04 at 20:47, Josh Haberman wrote: > > > Imagine being able to write to an API as simple and well-designed as > > this: > > Just out of interest, why are paNoDevice, paFloat

Re: [linux-audio-dev] newest audio server for Linux (yep, yetanother)

2003-02-04 Thread Bob Ham
On Tue, 2003-02-04 at 20:47, Josh Haberman wrote: > Imagine being able to write to an API as simple and well-designed as > this: Just out of interest, why are paNoDevice, paFloat32, etc, defines instead of const values? Bob -- If y

Re: [linux-audio-dev] newest audio server for Linux (yep, yetanother)

2003-02-04 Thread Josh Haberman
On Tue, 2003-02-04 at 06:03, Paul Davis wrote: > >Despite that I strongly think that an audio server that not permit in > >native way the traditional approach (what you call blocking approach) > >will never achieve the driving role we'd need. > > if linux developers continue to work with this trad