Re: [linux-audio-dev] off topic, optical protocols

2002-03-05 Thread D. Stimits
"Richard C. Burnett" wrote: > > > That is one variation. But if the "sphere" is really the "disco ball" > > type surface...a sphere that has a large number of small flat surfaces > > that altogether almost are a sphere...then that isn't a problem. Like I > > said, there are variations on the geom

Re: [linux-audio-dev] off topic, optical protocols

2002-03-05 Thread Richard C. Burnett
> That is one variation. But if the "sphere" is really the "disco ball" > type surface...a sphere that has a large number of small flat surfaces > that altogether almost are a sphere...then that isn't a problem. Like I > said, there are variations on the geometry to do different things. The > base

Re: [linux-audio-dev] off topic, optical protocols

2002-03-05 Thread D. Stimits
"Richard C. Burnett" wrote: > > What you are making in itself is an analog to digital > converter. Questions that pop off the top of my head: > > 1. different angles will have different lengths to the detectors, are you > thinking of making the detectors curve to the geometric shape? That is o

Re: [linux-audio-dev] off topic, optical protocols

2002-03-05 Thread Nick Bailey
Nope, I meant a Michaelson interferrometer. This has a single detector is used and it counts interference fringes as the distance between the diaphragm and laser changes. So you are actually measuring displacement to the accuracy of a wavelength of light, and using a counting process (which i

Re: [linux-audio-dev] off topic, optical protocols

2002-03-05 Thread Richard C. Burnett
What you are making in itself is an analog to digital converter. Questions that pop off the top of my head: 1. different angles will have different lengths to the detectors, are you thinking of making the detectors curve to the geometric shape? 2. Since the laser will not be a point but a spr

Re: [linux-audio-dev] off topic, optical protocols

2002-03-05 Thread Richard C. Burnett
> I'm not much of an engineering guy, but does switching to optical > necessarily mean switching to digital? Couldn't you use the frequency of > the light much like an electrical wire? I guess it depends on the > available hardware. You would have to modulate the light regardless, so it would b

Re: [linux-audio-dev] off topic, optical protocols

2002-03-05 Thread Steve Harris
On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 06:31:12 -0700, D. Stimits wrote: > I'm also interested in knowing how hard it is, in general, to create > optical output hardware for audio devices, specifically if I were to > make a small microphone pre-amp, and wanted it to create optical output > instead of analog, how

Re: [linux-audio-dev] off topic, optical protocols

2002-03-05 Thread Ruben van Royen
Hi, I thought, thats interesting, lets do a search on google. So I search for digital microphone. And came up with: http://www.ptang.com/digmic/showpatimg For those who don't want to bother with the link: It's a patent for putting the A/D converter in the microphone housing! Guess Neumann will

Re: [linux-audio-dev] off topic, optical protocols

2002-03-05 Thread Nick Bailey
actuallyt you can get digital microponones: they measure the displacement of the diaphram by counting fringes on a laser interferometer, so there never is an analogue signal (except the physical movement of the membrane itself). Damned if I can find a reference to it now... I hope it wasn't a

Re: [linux-audio-dev] off topic, optical protocols

2002-03-04 Thread D. Stimits
Taybin Rutkin wrote: > > On Mon, 4 Mar 2002, D. Stimits wrote: > > > schemes can be used such that center and center drift does not care > > about some of the component wear. Add to this that eliminating any D/A > > or A/D controller and using direct optical means is a guaranteed 100% > > linear

Re: [linux-audio-dev] off topic, optical protocols

2002-03-04 Thread Taybin Rutkin
On Mon, 4 Mar 2002, D. Stimits wrote: > schemes can be used such that center and center drift does not care > about some of the component wear. Add to this that eliminating any D/A > or A/D controller and using direct optical means is a guaranteed 100% > linear signal, no temperature drive ever.

Re: [linux-audio-dev] off topic, optical protocols

2002-03-04 Thread D. Stimits
Taybin Rutkin wrote: > > On Mon, 4 Mar 2002, D. Stimits wrote: > > > make a small microphone pre-amp, and wanted it to create optical output > > instead of analog, how big of a mess would I be getting into? > > I'm not much of an engineering guy, but does switching to optical > necessarily mean

Re: [linux-audio-dev] off topic, optical protocols

2002-03-04 Thread Taybin Rutkin
On Mon, 4 Mar 2002, D. Stimits wrote: > make a small microphone pre-amp, and wanted it to create optical output > instead of analog, how big of a mess would I be getting into? I'm not much of an engineering guy, but does switching to optical necessarily mean switching to digital? Couldn't you u

[linux-audio-dev] off topic, optical protocols

2002-03-04 Thread D. Stimits
This isn't really an audio Q, but it is probably best asked of audio programmers. I have never looked at optical protocols for audio cards, I'm wondering if anyone could give me a ball park estimate of how feasible it would be to create a controller device, such as a joystick, that has direct opti