Re: [linux-audio-dev] ogg vs mp3 fame discussion

2005-07-24 Thread Jens M Andreasen
On Sat, 2005-07-23 at 17:50 +0200, Leonard "paniq" Ritter wrote: > > i just know that whenever i post OV URL's for windows users, they say they > > need mp3 files. which may or may not be true in and of itself, but its > > still > > a major issue that they believe that. > > its all lazy bastar

Re: [linux-audio-dev] ogg vs mp3 fame discussion

2005-07-23 Thread Esben Stien
Esben Stien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I like the name, vorbis Though, I more like recursive acronyms;) -- Esben Stien is [EMAIL PROTECTED] s a http://www. s tn m irc://irc. b - i . e/%23contact [sip|iax]: e e

Re: [linux-audio-dev] ogg vs mp3 fame discussion

2005-07-23 Thread Esben Stien
"Leonard \"paniq\" Ritter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > i'd rather want to use something else instead. FLAC? > you cant hype a name that does not sound good. I like the name, vorbis, but I only use flac inside matroska containers. -- Esben Stien is [EMAIL PROTECTED] s a

Re: [linux-audio-dev] ogg vs mp3 fame discussion

2005-07-23 Thread Leonard \"paniq\" Ritter
On Saturday 23 July 2005 17:13, Paul Davis wrote: > there are lots of reasons to. first of all: what is the source of > material in OV format? does any major legal or illegal download system > provide OV format for any sizeable chunk of popular music? second, every > supported format implies more w