Eliot Blennerhassett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> we at audioscience
I will certainly put my eyes on audioscience now.
Having a company working so close with the community is really great.
--
Esben Stien is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.esben-stien.name
irc://irc.esben-stien.name/%23contact
Hallo,
Mark Knecht hat gesagt: // Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Nov 2004 22:09:17 +0100, Frank Barknecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > Nobody can steal free software, because they already own it. (As long
> > as they follow the rules as stated in the GPL etc.)
>
> This is so patently
On Sun, 2004-11-28 at 22:09 +0100, Frank Barknecht wrote:
> Hallo,
> Lee Revell hat gesagt: // Lee Revell wrote:
>
> > Nvidia has a lot more valuable IP at stake than VIA when they
> > release an open source driver for their 3D gear. If you don't
> > understand why, I can't help you.
>
> I do un
On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 09:27:46AM +1300, Eliot Blennerhassett wrote:
> So, what is the difference between our current offerings and what you'd like
> to see in a "pro audio card"?
I don't see any gross difference except the input/output connectors.
Bundle the 5042 or 5044 with adapters or break
Hallo,
Lee Revell hat gesagt: // Lee Revell wrote:
> Nvidia has a lot more valuable IP at stake than VIA when they
> release an open source driver for their 3D gear. If you don't
> understand why, I can't help you.
I do understand this very well. Because this is the central conflict:
I will not
> > > Ah i don't know. I mean, you guys have put a lot of time into what your
> > > doing anyway. And in my case the trust in rme turned out to be a bummer
> > > just becasue i was thinking that they have trust in the open source
> > > developers. If they did have such trust, something like this w
On Sun, 2004-11-28 at 18:12 +0100, Frank Barknecht wrote:
> And who the heck cares, that you
> cannot buy a single modern 3D-card anymore, which has open source
> drivers, by any manufacturer?
Sure you can. The VIA unichrome cards have open 3D drivers. But, of
course, it's not the best 3D hardwa
On Sun, 2004-11-28 at 19:53, Jan Depner wrote:
> On Sun, 2004-11-28 at 10:15, Marek Peteraj wrote:
> > On Sun, 2004-11-28 at 14:50, Tim Goetze wrote:
> > > [Marek Peteraj]
> > > >> RME has provided
> > > >> "Pro" grade audio hardware when Linux Audio needed it
> > > >> in order to become a legitima
On Sun, 2004-11-28 at 10:15, Marek Peteraj wrote:
> On Sun, 2004-11-28 at 14:50, Tim Goetze wrote:
> > [Marek Peteraj]
> > >> RME has provided
> > >> "Pro" grade audio hardware when Linux Audio needed it
> > >> in order to become a legitimate alternative to
> > >> proprietary solutions.
> > >
> > >
Marek Peteraj wrote:
Oh BTW, just in case :)
http://www.petitiononline.com/atipet/petition.html
Free as in Nelson Mandela :)
~ Simon
> Why? Because with the availability of closed drivers the (market)
> demand for open source drivers suddenly becomes as small as the
> handful of Libre Software supporters like I am one. The "just make my
> hardware work" type of Linux users is not interested in Open Source
> drivers anymore, so w
Hallo,
Jan Depner hat gesagt: // Jan Depner wrote:
> On Sat, 2004-11-27 at 15:36, Lee Revell wrote:
> > IMO the issue is not whether RME's concern is valid - clearly it is.
> > Sorry, but arguing otherwise makes us look stupid and naive. The issue
> > is how to address this concern. If that mean
On Sun, 2004-11-28 at 14:50, Tim Goetze wrote:
> [Marek Peteraj]
> >> RME has provided
> >> "Pro" grade audio hardware when Linux Audio needed it
> >> in order to become a legitimate alternative to
> >> proprietary solutions.
> >
> >Not really. It was Paul, Thomas, and one other guy(don't remember
[Marek Peteraj]
>> RME has provided
>> "Pro" grade audio hardware when Linux Audio needed it
>> in order to become a legitimate alternative to
>> proprietary solutions.
>
>Not really. It was Paul, Thomas, and one other guy(don't remember the
>name) who did. Remember it was almost no investment from
On Sun, 2004-11-28 at 14:03, tim hall wrote:
> Last Saturday 27 November 2004 21:36, Lee Revell was like:
> > On Sat, 2004-11-27 at 15:43 -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
> > > > Did this happen?
> > >
> > > Maybe not to them but look at Mackie and Behringer.
> >
> > Just to save people some googling here
On Sun, 2004-11-28 at 13:35, R Parker wrote:
> --- Marek Peteraj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 2004-11-27 at 23:21, Lee Revell wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2004-11-27 at 16:22 -0600, Jan Depner
> > wrote:
> > > > Man, I've been waiting all day for someone to
> > say this. Personally,
>
On Sat, 2004-11-27 at 22:36, Lee Revell wrote:
> On Sat, 2004-11-27 at 15:43 -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
> > > Did this happen?
> >
> > Maybe not to them but look at Mackie and Behringer.
>
> Just to save people some googling here is a thread that documents the
> long and colorful history of pro aud
On Sat, 2004-11-27 at 23:21, Lee Revell wrote:
> On Sat, 2004-11-27 at 16:22 -0600, Jan Depner wrote:
> > Man, I've been waiting all day for someone to say this. Personally,
> > open source is not a religion for me so a closed source driver would be
> > fine and dandy. Let the flames commence
On Sat, 2004-11-27 at 16:22 -0600, Jan Depner wrote:
> Man, I've been waiting all day for someone to say this. Personally,
> open source is not a religion for me so a closed source driver would be
> fine and dandy. Let the flames commence - now where did I put my
> asbestos underwear?
Eh,
On Sat, 2004-11-27 at 15:36, Lee Revell wrote:
> On Sat, 2004-11-27 at 15:43 -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
> > > Did this happen?
> >
> > Maybe not to them but look at Mackie and Behringer.
>
> Just to save people some googling here is a thread that documents the
> long and colorful history of pro aud
On Sat, 2004-11-27 at 15:43 -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
> > Did this happen?
>
> Maybe not to them but look at Mackie and Behringer.
Just to save people some googling here is a thread that documents the
long and colorful history of pro audio hardware manufacturers blatantly
ripping each other off, o
21 matches
Mail list logo
